The ancient inhabitants of Jebel Moya Redux: Measures of Population Affinity based on dental morphology

J. D. Irish, L. Konigsberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper reexamines some of the methods and craniometric findings in the classic volume The Ancient Inhabitants of Jebel Moya (Sudan) (1955) by Mukherjee, Rao & Trevor, in light of recent archaeological data and relative to a new dental morphological study. Archaeological evidence characterises these inhabitants as having been heavily influenced by outside sources; yet they managed to establish and maintain their own distinctive culture as seen in the site features and surviving artefact collections. The dental study, modelled after the original craniometric-based investigation and using the same or similar comparative samples, detected complementary indications of outside biological influence. In the study, up to 36 dental traits were recorded in a total of 19 African samples. The most influential traits in driving inter-sample variation were then identified, and phenetic affinities were calculated using the Mahalanobis D2 statistic for non-metric traits. If phenetic similarity provides an estimate of genetic relatedness, these affinities, like the original craniometric findings, suggest that the Jebel Moyans exhibited a mosaic of features that are reminiscent of, yet distinct from, both sub-Saharan and North African peoples. Together, these different lines of evidence correspond to portray the Jebel Moya populace as a uniform, although distinct, biocultural amalgam.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-156
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes


  • African
  • Dental anthropology
  • Phenetic affinity
  • Sudan
  • Trait variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology


Dive into the research topics of 'The ancient inhabitants of Jebel Moya Redux: Measures of Population Affinity based on dental morphology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this