THE AESTHETICS AND/OR FORMALISM OF CHANGE: Paradoxes and Contradictions in the Metabolist Movement

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The chapter will investigate some of the paradoxical and contradictory issues that characterized the activities of the Metabolists in Japanese architecture of the 1960s and even beyond. After the numerous unrealized futuristic or utopian visions for urban renewal in postwar Japan, the young architects in the Metabolism Group embarked on their own individual practices and were determined to implement aspects of their ideas for change, interchangeability, and thus flexibility in built architecture. This chapter will examine the relationship between the Metabolist theories and the changing realities in society, which first prompted the emergence, then shaped the development, and eventually fostered the decline of the movement. Special focus will be on the means through which the new ideas of urban design were translated into built structures: the formal and structural representation of change, and the actual change they intended to promote. It will also shed light on the divergent and often contradictory approaches by the individual architects as well as the unusually close relationship between this avant-garde movement and (political) authorities. Finally, it will consider the legacies of the movement and the relevance of its ideas for the much-changed world of today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Urbanism of Metabolism
Subtitle of host publicationVisions, Scenarios and Models for the Mutant City of Tomorrow
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages22-44
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781000539417
ISBN (Print)9781032030715
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering
  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE AESTHETICS AND/OR FORMALISM OF CHANGE: Paradoxes and Contradictions in the Metabolist Movement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this