TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing a Theoretical Assumption of a Learning-Trajectories Approach in Teaching Length Measurement to Kindergartners
AU - Sarama, Julie
AU - Clements, Douglas H.
AU - Baroody, Arthur J.
AU - Kutaka, Traci S.
AU - Chernyavskiy, Pavel
AU - Shi, Jackie
AU - Cong, Menglong
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education through Grant No. R305A150243. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the U.S. Department of Education.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We tested a specific theoretical assumption of a learning trajectories (LTs) approach to curriculum and teaching in the domain of early length measurement. Participating kindergartners (n = 189) were assigned to one of three conditions: LT, reverse-order (REV), or business-as-usual (BAU). LT and REV students received one-on-one instruction using the same activities from a length LT, while the REV condition reversed the LT order. At posttest, LT and REV children exhibited significantly greater learning relative to BAU peers. But importantly, LT children outperformed their REV peers. We conclude that instruction following LTs (i.e., providing instruction just beyond a child’s present level of thinking, progressing through the levels in order as the child advances) may promote more learning than an equivalent amount of instruction using the same activities but that are not theoretically sequenced.
AB - We tested a specific theoretical assumption of a learning trajectories (LTs) approach to curriculum and teaching in the domain of early length measurement. Participating kindergartners (n = 189) were assigned to one of three conditions: LT, reverse-order (REV), or business-as-usual (BAU). LT and REV students received one-on-one instruction using the same activities from a length LT, while the REV condition reversed the LT order. At posttest, LT and REV children exhibited significantly greater learning relative to BAU peers. But importantly, LT children outperformed their REV peers. We conclude that instruction following LTs (i.e., providing instruction just beyond a child’s present level of thinking, progressing through the levels in order as the child advances) may promote more learning than an equivalent amount of instruction using the same activities but that are not theoretically sequenced.
KW - achievement
KW - curriculum
KW - early childhood
KW - instructional design/development
KW - learning environments
KW - learning trajectories
KW - mathematics education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108889890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108889890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23328584211026657
DO - 10.1177/23328584211026657
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108889890
SN - 2332-8584
VL - 7
JO - AERA Open
JF - AERA Open
ER -