TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers’ and Students’ Negotiation Moves When Teachers Scaffold Group Work
AU - González, Gloriana
AU - DeJarnette, Anna F.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research in this article was supported with funding to the first author from the Hardie Faculty Fellows Program at the College of Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Publisher Copyright:
© Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2015/1/2
Y1 - 2015/1/2
N2 - Group work has been a main activity recommended by mathematics education reform. We aim at describing the patterns of interaction between teachers and students during group work. We ask: How do teachers scaffold group work during a problem-based lesson? We use data from a problem-based lesson taught in six geometry class periods by two teachers who did not routinely implement problem-based small group work. We applied systemic functional linguistics to examine teacher and student moves when the teachers assisted the groups. We found that the teachers’ scaffolding moves exemplified analytic and social scaffolding because the teachers made the content needed for solving the problem explicit, and, also, encouraged students. The students’ performance of moves showed how they controlled the timeliness and the content of the scaffolds. The findings support prior research on classroom norms that increase student opportunities for conceptual agency and illustrate how those opportunities emerge.
AB - Group work has been a main activity recommended by mathematics education reform. We aim at describing the patterns of interaction between teachers and students during group work. We ask: How do teachers scaffold group work during a problem-based lesson? We use data from a problem-based lesson taught in six geometry class periods by two teachers who did not routinely implement problem-based small group work. We applied systemic functional linguistics to examine teacher and student moves when the teachers assisted the groups. We found that the teachers’ scaffolding moves exemplified analytic and social scaffolding because the teachers made the content needed for solving the problem explicit, and, also, encouraged students. The students’ performance of moves showed how they controlled the timeliness and the content of the scaffolds. The findings support prior research on classroom norms that increase student opportunities for conceptual agency and illustrate how those opportunities emerge.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927562421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927562421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07370008.2014.987058
DO - 10.1080/07370008.2014.987058
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84927562421
SN - 0737-0008
VL - 33
SP - 1
EP - 45
JO - Cognition and Instruction
JF - Cognition and Instruction
IS - 1
ER -