Systematic review of queer and minority identities in romantic relationships research

Eleanor J. Junkins, Keely A. Dugan, Samar Chehab, Y. Sarah Han, Tingyan Liu, Jiepeng Yuan, Jaime Derringer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Romantic relationships are key to our health, yet recent reviews of relationships research show that sexual and/or gender diverse people and other traditionally under-represented groups are frequently excluded. Articles published from 2016 to 2020 in four relationships journals were reviewed to address the overall representation of sexual and gender minority (SGM) respondents (k = 891), and discuss the specific social identities included in U.S. samples (k = 505). First, only 37% of samples reported gender and sexual orientation, 21% of samples included SGM respondents in analyses, and 6% of samples excluded SGM respondents from the data. Second, samples were, on average, 77.4% White, 13.3% Hispanic, 58.8% (cisgender) women, 41.0% (cisgender) men, and 89.6% heterosexual. Consideration of intersecting identities was rare. We make recommendations to improve reporting and the representation of diverse identities. For social science to reflect the diversity of experiences present in society at large requires more intentional, reflective, and consistent consideration of diverse identities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-538
Number of pages22
JournalPsychology and Sexuality
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Systematic review
  • gender identity
  • racial/ethnic identity
  • relationships research
  • sexual orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of queer and minority identities in romantic relationships research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this