TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of queer and minority identities in romantic relationships research
AU - Junkins, Eleanor J.
AU - Dugan, Keely A.
AU - Chehab, Samar
AU - Han, Y. Sarah
AU - Liu, Tingyan
AU - Yuan, Jiepeng
AU - Derringer, Jaime
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Romantic relationships are key to our health, yet recent reviews of relationships research show that sexual and/or gender diverse people and other traditionally under-represented groups are frequently excluded. Articles published from 2016 to 2020 in four relationships journals were reviewed to address the overall representation of sexual and gender minority (SGM) respondents (k = 891), and discuss the specific social identities included in U.S. samples (k = 505). First, only 37% of samples reported gender and sexual orientation, 21% of samples included SGM respondents in analyses, and 6% of samples excluded SGM respondents from the data. Second, samples were, on average, 77.4% White, 13.3% Hispanic, 58.8% (cisgender) women, 41.0% (cisgender) men, and 89.6% heterosexual. Consideration of intersecting identities was rare. We make recommendations to improve reporting and the representation of diverse identities. For social science to reflect the diversity of experiences present in society at large requires more intentional, reflective, and consistent consideration of diverse identities.
AB - Romantic relationships are key to our health, yet recent reviews of relationships research show that sexual and/or gender diverse people and other traditionally under-represented groups are frequently excluded. Articles published from 2016 to 2020 in four relationships journals were reviewed to address the overall representation of sexual and gender minority (SGM) respondents (k = 891), and discuss the specific social identities included in U.S. samples (k = 505). First, only 37% of samples reported gender and sexual orientation, 21% of samples included SGM respondents in analyses, and 6% of samples excluded SGM respondents from the data. Second, samples were, on average, 77.4% White, 13.3% Hispanic, 58.8% (cisgender) women, 41.0% (cisgender) men, and 89.6% heterosexual. Consideration of intersecting identities was rare. We make recommendations to improve reporting and the representation of diverse identities. For social science to reflect the diversity of experiences present in society at large requires more intentional, reflective, and consistent consideration of diverse identities.
KW - Systematic review
KW - gender identity
KW - racial/ethnic identity
KW - relationships research
KW - sexual orientation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183845450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183845450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19419899.2024.2307045
DO - 10.1080/19419899.2024.2307045
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183845450
SN - 1941-9899
VL - 15
SP - 517
EP - 538
JO - Psychology and Sexuality
JF - Psychology and Sexuality
IS - 4
ER -