Summary judgment and the reasonable jury standard: A proxy for a Judge's own view of the sufficiency of the evidence?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Under motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law, judges employ the reasonable jury standard, deciding whether a reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party. This article explores the propriety of the reasonable jury standard, argues the standard has become a proxy for a judge's own view of the evidence, and proposes renewed study of the standard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-227
Number of pages6
JournalJudicature
Volume97
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

evidence
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Summary judgment and the reasonable jury standard : A proxy for a Judge's own view of the sufficiency of the evidence? / Thomas, Suja A.

In: Judicature, Vol. 97, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 222-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0010d2b3664141ba9addd123a1b14354,
title = "Summary judgment and the reasonable jury standard: A proxy for a Judge's own view of the sufficiency of the evidence?",
abstract = "Under motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law, judges employ the reasonable jury standard, deciding whether a reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party. This article explores the propriety of the reasonable jury standard, argues the standard has become a proxy for a judge's own view of the evidence, and proposes renewed study of the standard.",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "222--227",
journal = "Judicature",
issn = "0022-5800",
publisher = "American Judicature Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Summary judgment and the reasonable jury standard

T2 - A proxy for a Judge's own view of the sufficiency of the evidence?

AU - Thomas, Suja A

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Under motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law, judges employ the reasonable jury standard, deciding whether a reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party. This article explores the propriety of the reasonable jury standard, argues the standard has become a proxy for a judge's own view of the evidence, and proposes renewed study of the standard.

AB - Under motions for summary judgment, directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law, judges employ the reasonable jury standard, deciding whether a reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party. This article explores the propriety of the reasonable jury standard, argues the standard has become a proxy for a judge's own view of the evidence, and proposes renewed study of the standard.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899808831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899808831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899808831

VL - 97

SP - 222

EP - 227

JO - Judicature

JF - Judicature

SN - 0022-5800

IS - 5

ER -