TY - JOUR
T1 - Succès de nidification et sélection des sites de nidification d'oiseaux de milieux humides dans un système de milieux humides restaurés
AU - Fournier, Auriel M.V.
AU - Lancaster, Joseph D.
AU - Yetter, Aaron P
AU - Hine, Christopher S.
AU - Beckerman, Tyler
AU - Figge, Jacob
AU - Gioe, Antonio
AU - Greider-Wagner, Macayla
AU - Jen, Devin
AU - Johnson, Cody
AU - Larreur, Max R.
AU - Shaw, Abigail
AU - Wolter, Kayanna
AU - Wood, Michael
AU - Wu, Daniel K.
AU - O'neal, Benjamin J.
AU - Hagy, Heath
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Illinois Natural History Survey and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, National Great River Research and Education Center, Illinois Ornithological Society, The Nature Conservancy, and Bob and Karen Fisher for funding. This work was supported in part through internships provided by the National Great Rivers Research & Education Center through grant #NGRREC-IP2019-05. We thank the staff, technicians, and volunteers at the Forbes Biological Station who helped over the course of this project, including Michelle Horath, Kristen Finch, Sarah McClain, Doug McClain, Jeff Benjamin, Sam Klimas, Cheyenne Beach, Josh Osborn, Andy Gilbert, Margaret Gross, Greg Fretueg, Jacob Lux, Fletcher O'hara, Seth Owens, Dallas Glazik, Jacob Yetter, Krista Hardy, Lythande Singleton, Mallory Shaw, and Molly Jugovic. Thanks to The Nature Conservancy for access to Emiquon Preserve.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Paper.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Although most emergent wetlands across central North America have been destroyed or degraded, wetland restoration in recent decades has provided new habitat resources for wetland birds in agriculturally dominated landscapes. The goals of wetland restorations often include providing habitat for migratory and breeding waterfowl and other wetland birds. One such restored wetland complex in the Illinois River Valley, the Emiquon Preserve, is isolated from most flooding events of the Illinois River allowing the growth of persistent emergent vegetation that was quickly colonized by breeding wetland birds. We examined nest occurrence and variables influencing site selection, nest success, and changes in nest density across stages of the wetland succession cycle. We located 327 nests from nine species of wetland birds (American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus; American Coot, Fulica americana; Black-crowned Night-Heron, Nycticorax nycticorax; Black-necked Stilt, Himantopus mexicanus; Common Gallinule, Gallinula galeata; Green Heron, Butorides virescens; Least Bittern, Ixobrychus exilis; Pied-billed Grebe, Podilymbus podiceps; Sora, Porzana carolina) during 2013–2019. Common Gallinules were more likely to nest in persistent emergent vegetation than other cover types. American Coots and Least Bitterns selected nest sites based on water depth. Black-necked Stilt and Black-crowned Night-Heron nests were less successful in deeper water. Black-necked Stilt, Black-crowned Night-Heron, and Common Gallinule nests were less successful with later initiation dates. Nest density did not vary between persistent emergent and hemi-marsh cover types. Across 2013–2019 we estimated an average of 372 nests/year for six marsh-nesting bird species at Emiquon, including two state-endangered (Common Gallinule and Black-crowned Night-Heron) and one state-threatened (Least Bittern). Wetlands restored from agricultural fields can quickly provide critical breeding habitat for marsh-nesting birds of conservation concern, although continued management is needed to provide resources to maintain persistent emergent vegetation communities as individual marshes transition through the marsh cycle.
AB - Although most emergent wetlands across central North America have been destroyed or degraded, wetland restoration in recent decades has provided new habitat resources for wetland birds in agriculturally dominated landscapes. The goals of wetland restorations often include providing habitat for migratory and breeding waterfowl and other wetland birds. One such restored wetland complex in the Illinois River Valley, the Emiquon Preserve, is isolated from most flooding events of the Illinois River allowing the growth of persistent emergent vegetation that was quickly colonized by breeding wetland birds. We examined nest occurrence and variables influencing site selection, nest success, and changes in nest density across stages of the wetland succession cycle. We located 327 nests from nine species of wetland birds (American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus; American Coot, Fulica americana; Black-crowned Night-Heron, Nycticorax nycticorax; Black-necked Stilt, Himantopus mexicanus; Common Gallinule, Gallinula galeata; Green Heron, Butorides virescens; Least Bittern, Ixobrychus exilis; Pied-billed Grebe, Podilymbus podiceps; Sora, Porzana carolina) during 2013–2019. Common Gallinules were more likely to nest in persistent emergent vegetation than other cover types. American Coots and Least Bitterns selected nest sites based on water depth. Black-necked Stilt and Black-crowned Night-Heron nests were less successful in deeper water. Black-necked Stilt, Black-crowned Night-Heron, and Common Gallinule nests were less successful with later initiation dates. Nest density did not vary between persistent emergent and hemi-marsh cover types. Across 2013–2019 we estimated an average of 372 nests/year for six marsh-nesting bird species at Emiquon, including two state-endangered (Common Gallinule and Black-crowned Night-Heron) and one state-threatened (Least Bittern). Wetlands restored from agricultural fields can quickly provide critical breeding habitat for marsh-nesting birds of conservation concern, although continued management is needed to provide resources to maintain persistent emergent vegetation communities as individual marshes transition through the marsh cycle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104950903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104950903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5751/ACE-01782-160106
DO - 10.5751/ACE-01782-160106
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104950903
SN - 1712-6568
VL - 16
JO - Avian Conservation and Ecology
JF - Avian Conservation and Ecology
IS - 1
M1 - 6
ER -