Subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A formal methodology is presented which may be used to evaluate design alternatives in the iterative design/redesign process. Deterministic multiattribute utility analysis is used to compare the overall utility or value of alternative designs as a function of the levels of several performance characteristics of a manufactured system. The evaluation function reflects the designers subjective preferences. Sensitivity analysis provides quantitative information as to how a design should be modified in order to increase its utility to the design decision maker. Improvements in one or more areas or performance and tradeoffs between attributes which would increase desirability of a design most may be quantified. A case study of materials selection and design in the automotive industry is presented. The methodology was applied to 6 automotive companies in the United States and Europe, and results are used to illustrate the steps followed in application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDesign Theory and Methodology - DTM '90
EditorsJames R. Rinderle
PublisherPubl by ASME
Pages355-361
Number of pages7
Volume27
StatePublished - 1990
Event1990 ASME Design Technical Conferences - Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology - Chicago, IL, USA
Duration: Sep 16 1990Sep 19 1990

Other

Other1990 ASME Design Technical Conferences - Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology
CityChicago, IL, USA
Period9/16/909/19/90

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this