Structural and Moral Commitment Among Same-Sex Couples: Relationship Duration, Religiosity, and Parental Status

Ramona Faith Oswald, Abbie Goldberg, Kate Kuvalanka, Eric Clausell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined ecological predictors of structural and moral commitment among cohabiting same-sex couples. Structural commitment was operationalized as the execution of legal documents, and moral commitment was operationalized as having a commitment ceremony. The authors tested 2 logistic regression models using a subsample of Rainbow Illinois survey respondents. First, the execution of legal documents was examined using the entire subsample (n = 190). Because antigay victimization may sensitize individuals to the importance of legal protection, actual and feared victimization were hypothesized to predict legalization. These hypotheses were not supported. However, relationship duration, a control variable, did predict legalization. The authors then used data only from those individuals who had executed a legal document (n = 150) to determine those who also reported a commitment ceremony (Model 2). Parental status, religiosity, involvement with a supportive congregation, and an interaction between gender and parental status were hypothesized to predict ritualization. Only religiosity and parental status emerged as significant. Results from this study demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between legalization and ritualization. Further, they extend knowledge about how same-sex couple commitment is shaped by noncouple factors, such as time, individual religiosity, and parental status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-419
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
Logistic Models
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • legal
  • lesbian/gay
  • relationship commitment
  • ritual
  • same-sex couples

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Structural and Moral Commitment Among Same-Sex Couples : Relationship Duration, Religiosity, and Parental Status. / Oswald, Ramona Faith; Goldberg, Abbie; Kuvalanka, Kate; Clausell, Eric.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.06.2008, p. 411-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37aab6b0dc4c4771b02ac174a2122f82,
title = "Structural and Moral Commitment Among Same-Sex Couples: Relationship Duration, Religiosity, and Parental Status",
abstract = "This study examined ecological predictors of structural and moral commitment among cohabiting same-sex couples. Structural commitment was operationalized as the execution of legal documents, and moral commitment was operationalized as having a commitment ceremony. The authors tested 2 logistic regression models using a subsample of Rainbow Illinois survey respondents. First, the execution of legal documents was examined using the entire subsample (n = 190). Because antigay victimization may sensitize individuals to the importance of legal protection, actual and feared victimization were hypothesized to predict legalization. These hypotheses were not supported. However, relationship duration, a control variable, did predict legalization. The authors then used data only from those individuals who had executed a legal document (n = 150) to determine those who also reported a commitment ceremony (Model 2). Parental status, religiosity, involvement with a supportive congregation, and an interaction between gender and parental status were hypothesized to predict ritualization. Only religiosity and parental status emerged as significant. Results from this study demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between legalization and ritualization. Further, they extend knowledge about how same-sex couple commitment is shaped by noncouple factors, such as time, individual religiosity, and parental status.",
keywords = "legal, lesbian/gay, relationship commitment, ritual, same-sex couples",
author = "Oswald, {Ramona Faith} and Abbie Goldberg and Kate Kuvalanka and Eric Clausell",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.411",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "411--419",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural and Moral Commitment Among Same-Sex Couples

T2 - Relationship Duration, Religiosity, and Parental Status

AU - Oswald, Ramona Faith

AU - Goldberg, Abbie

AU - Kuvalanka, Kate

AU - Clausell, Eric

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - This study examined ecological predictors of structural and moral commitment among cohabiting same-sex couples. Structural commitment was operationalized as the execution of legal documents, and moral commitment was operationalized as having a commitment ceremony. The authors tested 2 logistic regression models using a subsample of Rainbow Illinois survey respondents. First, the execution of legal documents was examined using the entire subsample (n = 190). Because antigay victimization may sensitize individuals to the importance of legal protection, actual and feared victimization were hypothesized to predict legalization. These hypotheses were not supported. However, relationship duration, a control variable, did predict legalization. The authors then used data only from those individuals who had executed a legal document (n = 150) to determine those who also reported a commitment ceremony (Model 2). Parental status, religiosity, involvement with a supportive congregation, and an interaction between gender and parental status were hypothesized to predict ritualization. Only religiosity and parental status emerged as significant. Results from this study demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between legalization and ritualization. Further, they extend knowledge about how same-sex couple commitment is shaped by noncouple factors, such as time, individual religiosity, and parental status.

AB - This study examined ecological predictors of structural and moral commitment among cohabiting same-sex couples. Structural commitment was operationalized as the execution of legal documents, and moral commitment was operationalized as having a commitment ceremony. The authors tested 2 logistic regression models using a subsample of Rainbow Illinois survey respondents. First, the execution of legal documents was examined using the entire subsample (n = 190). Because antigay victimization may sensitize individuals to the importance of legal protection, actual and feared victimization were hypothesized to predict legalization. These hypotheses were not supported. However, relationship duration, a control variable, did predict legalization. The authors then used data only from those individuals who had executed a legal document (n = 150) to determine those who also reported a commitment ceremony (Model 2). Parental status, religiosity, involvement with a supportive congregation, and an interaction between gender and parental status were hypothesized to predict ritualization. Only religiosity and parental status emerged as significant. Results from this study demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between legalization and ritualization. Further, they extend knowledge about how same-sex couple commitment is shaped by noncouple factors, such as time, individual religiosity, and parental status.

KW - legal

KW - lesbian/gay

KW - relationship commitment

KW - ritual

KW - same-sex couples

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949120721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949120721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.411

DO - 10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.411

M3 - Article

C2 - 18540769

AN - SCOPUS:44949120721

VL - 22

SP - 411

EP - 419

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 3

ER -