Strategies and Automaticity: II. Dynamic Aspects of Strategy Adjustment

David L. Strayer, Arthur F. Kramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The temporal dynamics of strategic adjustment of response criteria were examined by comparing performance in blocked conditions, in which all stimulus-response mappings were either consistent (CM) or varied (VM), to performance in mixed conditions, in which CM and VM items were presented in the same block of trials. We examined the degree of flexibility that subjects exhibit in deploying differential response strategies. Surprisingly, Ss were unable to use a variety of informative pre-cues to rapidly shift between response strategies associated with automatic (CM) and nonautomatic (VM) processing. However, an analysis of sequential dependencies indicated that repetition of stimuli from the same class (CM vs. VM) gradually led to shifts in response strategies. These results are interpreted within the framework of an extension of M. Treisman and T.C. Williams's (1984) 2-stage criteria adjustment model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-365
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1994

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language


Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies and Automaticity: II. Dynamic Aspects of Strategy Adjustment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this