TY - JOUR
T1 - Stone blowing as a remedial measure to mitigate differential movement problems at railroad bridge approaches
AU - Boler, Huseyin
AU - Mishra, Debakanta
AU - Tutumluer, Erol
AU - Chrismer, Steven
AU - Hyslip, James P.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research reported in this paper was sponsored by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) BAA program.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Cameron Stuart and Gary Carr of the FRA, as well as David Staplin, Mike Trosino and Jonathan Wnek of AMTRAK for all their help and support. All instrumentation components were designed, manufactured, and installed under the supervision of Mr. Mike Tomas of AMTRAK. The authors would also like to thank Marty Perkins and Carl Walker of AMTRAK; and Hasan Kazmee, Michael Wnek, and James Pforr of the University of Illinois for their help with the instrumentation activities. The authors also acknowledge the support and contributions of the project co-PI Prof. Timothy D. Stark throughout this research study. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
Publisher Copyright:
© IMechE 2018.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Railroad track transitions such as bridge approaches often experience recurrent track geometry problems due to differential settlement between the bridge and the adjacent track. The resulting “bump at the end of the bridge” leads to significant passenger discomfort and causes rapid deterioration of the track as well as vehicular components. In general, railroad managers address recurrent track geometry defects through track resurfacing methods, such as tamping that involve raising the track through mechanically induced vibration and rearrangement of particles within the ballast layer. Although widely used for track resurfacing, the tamping process tends to destabilize the ballast layer, and the track may rapidly return to its former deteriorated state based on the traffic flow. The method of “stone blowing,” on the other hand, which was developed as an alternative to tamping, relies on the principle of injecting fresh ballast particles into gaps underneath ties and raising the track level rather than disturbing the packing condition of the existing ballast. In a recently completed research study in the United States, stone blowing was successfully implemented as a remedial measure to mitigate the problem of differential movement at a problematic bridge approach along Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor. Advanced geotechnical instrumentation was used to monitor transient deformations within individual track substructure layers before and after stone blowing. Moreover, tie support conditions and track geometry data were also analyzed to quantify the effectiveness of stone blowing on the improvement of track performance.
AB - Railroad track transitions such as bridge approaches often experience recurrent track geometry problems due to differential settlement between the bridge and the adjacent track. The resulting “bump at the end of the bridge” leads to significant passenger discomfort and causes rapid deterioration of the track as well as vehicular components. In general, railroad managers address recurrent track geometry defects through track resurfacing methods, such as tamping that involve raising the track through mechanically induced vibration and rearrangement of particles within the ballast layer. Although widely used for track resurfacing, the tamping process tends to destabilize the ballast layer, and the track may rapidly return to its former deteriorated state based on the traffic flow. The method of “stone blowing,” on the other hand, which was developed as an alternative to tamping, relies on the principle of injecting fresh ballast particles into gaps underneath ties and raising the track level rather than disturbing the packing condition of the existing ballast. In a recently completed research study in the United States, stone blowing was successfully implemented as a remedial measure to mitigate the problem of differential movement at a problematic bridge approach along Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor. Advanced geotechnical instrumentation was used to monitor transient deformations within individual track substructure layers before and after stone blowing. Moreover, tie support conditions and track geometry data were also analyzed to quantify the effectiveness of stone blowing on the improvement of track performance.
KW - Stone blowing
KW - bridge approach
KW - differential movement
KW - multidepth deflectometer
KW - stone injection
KW - track transitions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047658406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047658406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0954409718778654
DO - 10.1177/0954409718778654
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047658406
SN - 0954-4097
VL - 233
SP - 63
EP - 72
JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
IS - 1
ER -