Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations

Connor M. Hults, Richard C. Francis, Edward K. Clint, Winter Smith, Elliott R. Sober, Theodore Garland, Justin S. Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A putative male advantage in wayfinding ability is the most widely documented sex difference in human cognition and has also been observed in other animals. The common interpretation, the sex-specific adaptation hypothesis, posits that this male advantage evolved as an adaptive response to sex differences in home range size. A previous study a decade ago tested this hypothesis by comparing sex differences in home range size and spatial ability among 11 species and found no relationship. However, the study was limited by the small sample size, the lack of species with a larger female home range and the lack of non-Western human data. The present study represents an update that addresses all of these limitations, including data from 10 more species and from human subsistence cultures. Consistent with the previous result, we found little evidence that sex differences in spatial navigation and home range size are related. We conclude that sex differences in spatial ability are more likely due to experiential factors and/or unselected biological side effects, rather than functional outcomes of natural selection.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number231532
Pages (from-to)231532
Number of pages1
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 17 2024

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • spatial cognition
  • sexual dimorphism
  • spandrel
  • home range

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this