TY - JOUR
T1 - Stereotyping effects on consumers' evaluation of advertising
T2 - Impact of racial differences between actors and viewers
AU - Qualls, William J.
AU - Moore, David J.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - The present experimental study compared the efficacy of two social/psychological theories of stereotyping for explaining the impact of race on consumers' evaluations of advertising. One theory, in‐group bias theory, posits that in‐group members on the basis of race will evaluate other in‐group members more favorably than out‐group members. A second theory, polarized appraisal theory, predicts that out‐group members will be evaluated more extremely (positively or negatively) than in‐group members. A major finding of the present study is that in‐group bias theory explains the effect of race in consumers' evaluation of advertising more accurately than does polarized appraisal theory.
AB - The present experimental study compared the efficacy of two social/psychological theories of stereotyping for explaining the impact of race on consumers' evaluations of advertising. One theory, in‐group bias theory, posits that in‐group members on the basis of race will evaluate other in‐group members more favorably than out‐group members. A second theory, polarized appraisal theory, predicts that out‐group members will be evaluated more extremely (positively or negatively) than in‐group members. A major finding of the present study is that in‐group bias theory explains the effect of race in consumers' evaluation of advertising more accurately than does polarized appraisal theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001019605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001019605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mar.4220070205
DO - 10.1002/mar.4220070205
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001019605
SN - 0742-6046
VL - 7
SP - 135
EP - 151
JO - Psychology & Marketing
JF - Psychology & Marketing
IS - 2
ER -