Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis: An application to precipitation fields

Bo Li, Adithya Murthi, Kenneth P. Bowman, Gerald R. North, Marc G. Genton, Michael Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Taylor hypothesis (TH) as applied to rainfall is a proposition about the space-time covariance structure of the rainfall field. Specifically, it supposes that if a spatiotemporal precipitation field with a stationary covariance Cov(r, τ) in both space r and time τ moves with a constant velocity v, then the temporal covariance at time lag τ is equal to the spatial covariance at space lag r = vτ that is, Cov(0, τ) = Cov(vτ, 0). Qualitatively this means that the field evolves slowly in time relative to the advective time scale, which is often referred to as the frozen field hypothesis. Of specific interest is whether there is a cutoff or decorrelation time scale for which the TH holds for a given mean flow velocity v. In this study, the validity of the TH is tested for precipitation fields using high-resolution gridded Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) reflectivity data produced by the WSI Corporation by employing two different statistical approaches. The first method is based on rigorous hypothesis testing, while the second is based on a simple correlation analysis, which neglects possible dependencies between the correlation estimates. Radar reflectivity values are used from the southeastern United States with an approximate horizontal resolution of 4 km × 4 km and a temporal resolution of 15 min. During the 4-day period from 2 to 5 May 2002, substantial precipitation occurs in the region of interest, and the motion of the precipitation systems is approximately uniform. The results of both statistical methods suggest that the TH might hold for the shortest space and time scales resolved by the data (4 km and 15 min) but that it does not hold for longer periods or larger spatial scales. Also, the simple correlation analysis tends to overestimate the statistical significance through failing to account for correlations between the covariance estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)254-265
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Hydrometeorology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 5 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

timescale
reflectivity
NEXRAD
rainfall
hypothesis testing
flow velocity
radar
test
analysis
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Li, B., Murthi, A., Bowman, K. P., North, G. R., Genton, M. G., & Sherman, M. (2009). Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis: An application to precipitation fields. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 10(1), 254-265. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1009.1

Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis : An application to precipitation fields. / Li, Bo; Murthi, Adithya; Bowman, Kenneth P.; North, Gerald R.; Genton, Marc G.; Sherman, Michael.

In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 05.05.2009, p. 254-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, B, Murthi, A, Bowman, KP, North, GR, Genton, MG & Sherman, M 2009, 'Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis: An application to precipitation fields', Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 254-265. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1009.1
Li, Bo ; Murthi, Adithya ; Bowman, Kenneth P. ; North, Gerald R. ; Genton, Marc G. ; Sherman, Michael. / Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis : An application to precipitation fields. In: Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 254-265.
@article{a5aa70ec67ff4cb295d335b646985b9f,
title = "Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis: An application to precipitation fields",
abstract = "The Taylor hypothesis (TH) as applied to rainfall is a proposition about the space-time covariance structure of the rainfall field. Specifically, it supposes that if a spatiotemporal precipitation field with a stationary covariance Cov(r, τ) in both space r and time τ moves with a constant velocity v, then the temporal covariance at time lag τ is equal to the spatial covariance at space lag r = vτ that is, Cov(0, τ) = Cov(vτ, 0). Qualitatively this means that the field evolves slowly in time relative to the advective time scale, which is often referred to as the frozen field hypothesis. Of specific interest is whether there is a cutoff or decorrelation time scale for which the TH holds for a given mean flow velocity v. In this study, the validity of the TH is tested for precipitation fields using high-resolution gridded Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) reflectivity data produced by the WSI Corporation by employing two different statistical approaches. The first method is based on rigorous hypothesis testing, while the second is based on a simple correlation analysis, which neglects possible dependencies between the correlation estimates. Radar reflectivity values are used from the southeastern United States with an approximate horizontal resolution of 4 km × 4 km and a temporal resolution of 15 min. During the 4-day period from 2 to 5 May 2002, substantial precipitation occurs in the region of interest, and the motion of the precipitation systems is approximately uniform. The results of both statistical methods suggest that the TH might hold for the shortest space and time scales resolved by the data (4 km and 15 min) but that it does not hold for longer periods or larger spatial scales. Also, the simple correlation analysis tends to overestimate the statistical significance through failing to account for correlations between the covariance estimates.",
author = "Bo Li and Adithya Murthi and Bowman, {Kenneth P.} and North, {Gerald R.} and Genton, {Marc G.} and Michael Sherman",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1175/2008JHM1009.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "254--265",
journal = "Journal of Hydrometeorology",
issn = "1525-755X",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical tests of Taylor's hypothesis

T2 - An application to precipitation fields

AU - Li, Bo

AU - Murthi, Adithya

AU - Bowman, Kenneth P.

AU - North, Gerald R.

AU - Genton, Marc G.

AU - Sherman, Michael

PY - 2009/5/5

Y1 - 2009/5/5

N2 - The Taylor hypothesis (TH) as applied to rainfall is a proposition about the space-time covariance structure of the rainfall field. Specifically, it supposes that if a spatiotemporal precipitation field with a stationary covariance Cov(r, τ) in both space r and time τ moves with a constant velocity v, then the temporal covariance at time lag τ is equal to the spatial covariance at space lag r = vτ that is, Cov(0, τ) = Cov(vτ, 0). Qualitatively this means that the field evolves slowly in time relative to the advective time scale, which is often referred to as the frozen field hypothesis. Of specific interest is whether there is a cutoff or decorrelation time scale for which the TH holds for a given mean flow velocity v. In this study, the validity of the TH is tested for precipitation fields using high-resolution gridded Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) reflectivity data produced by the WSI Corporation by employing two different statistical approaches. The first method is based on rigorous hypothesis testing, while the second is based on a simple correlation analysis, which neglects possible dependencies between the correlation estimates. Radar reflectivity values are used from the southeastern United States with an approximate horizontal resolution of 4 km × 4 km and a temporal resolution of 15 min. During the 4-day period from 2 to 5 May 2002, substantial precipitation occurs in the region of interest, and the motion of the precipitation systems is approximately uniform. The results of both statistical methods suggest that the TH might hold for the shortest space and time scales resolved by the data (4 km and 15 min) but that it does not hold for longer periods or larger spatial scales. Also, the simple correlation analysis tends to overestimate the statistical significance through failing to account for correlations between the covariance estimates.

AB - The Taylor hypothesis (TH) as applied to rainfall is a proposition about the space-time covariance structure of the rainfall field. Specifically, it supposes that if a spatiotemporal precipitation field with a stationary covariance Cov(r, τ) in both space r and time τ moves with a constant velocity v, then the temporal covariance at time lag τ is equal to the spatial covariance at space lag r = vτ that is, Cov(0, τ) = Cov(vτ, 0). Qualitatively this means that the field evolves slowly in time relative to the advective time scale, which is often referred to as the frozen field hypothesis. Of specific interest is whether there is a cutoff or decorrelation time scale for which the TH holds for a given mean flow velocity v. In this study, the validity of the TH is tested for precipitation fields using high-resolution gridded Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) reflectivity data produced by the WSI Corporation by employing two different statistical approaches. The first method is based on rigorous hypothesis testing, while the second is based on a simple correlation analysis, which neglects possible dependencies between the correlation estimates. Radar reflectivity values are used from the southeastern United States with an approximate horizontal resolution of 4 km × 4 km and a temporal resolution of 15 min. During the 4-day period from 2 to 5 May 2002, substantial precipitation occurs in the region of interest, and the motion of the precipitation systems is approximately uniform. The results of both statistical methods suggest that the TH might hold for the shortest space and time scales resolved by the data (4 km and 15 min) but that it does not hold for longer periods or larger spatial scales. Also, the simple correlation analysis tends to overestimate the statistical significance through failing to account for correlations between the covariance estimates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349162233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349162233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2008JHM1009.1

DO - 10.1175/2008JHM1009.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65349162233

VL - 10

SP - 254

EP - 265

JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology

JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology

SN - 1525-755X

IS - 1

ER -