“States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Afro-Caribbean slaves, Indian prostitutes and non-western women more generally from the 1860s to the First World War.3 When Brown's "states of injury" argument is viewed in this long historical context - one which makes visible the impact of colonial ideologies on Western feminist movements - it enables us more fully to appreciate why many late-Victorian feminists tried to negotiate discourses of imperialism which excluded them from formal political participation in the imperial state even as they legitimated women's social and above all racial contributions to the colonial enterprise. For with its twin emphases on the subjection of "native" peoples and the investment of British feminists in their pathetic plight, imperial feminism in the last decades of the nineteenth century was characterized by a rhetoric of pathos and suffering which, for all its righteous concern about the need for reform and uplift, did little to critique British colonialism or to distance The Cause from it. Indeed, it might be said that Victorian feminists were at pains to announce their own "wounded attachments" to the Empire through their sympathy for its colonial subjects - an identification which signaled their commitments to the colonial nation-state as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationWomen's Suffrage in the British Empire
Subtitle of host publicationCitizenship, Nation and Race
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages18-32
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781135639921
ISBN (Print)041520805X, 9781138007338
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

slavery
citizenship
Western world
imperialism
political participation
sympathy
slave
colonial age
feminism
nation state
Ideologies
pain
rhetoric
nineteenth century
commitment
reform
cause
Citizenship
Boer War
Colonies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Burton, A. (2012). “States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war. In Women's Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race (pp. 18-32). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714638-10

“States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war. / Burton, Antoinette.

Women's Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race. Taylor and Francis, 2012. p. 18-32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Burton, A 2012, “States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war. in Women's Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race. Taylor and Francis, pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714638-10
Burton A. “States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war. In Women's Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race. Taylor and Francis. 2012. p. 18-32 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714638-10
Burton, Antoinette. / “States of injury�? Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war. Women's Suffrage in the British Empire: Citizenship, Nation and Race. Taylor and Francis, 2012. pp. 18-32
@inbook{7e1225401a6a49ee9dbfd00a83561444,
title = "“States of injury�?: Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war",
abstract = "Afro-Caribbean slaves, Indian prostitutes and non-western women more generally from the 1860s to the First World War.3 When Brown's {"}states of injury{"} argument is viewed in this long historical context - one which makes visible the impact of colonial ideologies on Western feminist movements - it enables us more fully to appreciate why many late-Victorian feminists tried to negotiate discourses of imperialism which excluded them from formal political participation in the imperial state even as they legitimated women's social and above all racial contributions to the colonial enterprise. For with its twin emphases on the subjection of {"}native{"} peoples and the investment of British feminists in their pathetic plight, imperial feminism in the last decades of the nineteenth century was characterized by a rhetoric of pathos and suffering which, for all its righteous concern about the need for reform and uplift, did little to critique British colonialism or to distance The Cause from it. Indeed, it might be said that Victorian feminists were at pains to announce their own {"}wounded attachments{"} to the Empire through their sympathy for its colonial subjects - an identification which signaled their commitments to the colonial nation-state as well.",
author = "Antoinette Burton",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203714638-10",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "041520805X",
pages = "18--32",
booktitle = "Women's Suffrage in the British Empire",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - “States of injury�?

T2 - Josephine butler on slavery, citizenship, and the boer war

AU - Burton, Antoinette

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Afro-Caribbean slaves, Indian prostitutes and non-western women more generally from the 1860s to the First World War.3 When Brown's "states of injury" argument is viewed in this long historical context - one which makes visible the impact of colonial ideologies on Western feminist movements - it enables us more fully to appreciate why many late-Victorian feminists tried to negotiate discourses of imperialism which excluded them from formal political participation in the imperial state even as they legitimated women's social and above all racial contributions to the colonial enterprise. For with its twin emphases on the subjection of "native" peoples and the investment of British feminists in their pathetic plight, imperial feminism in the last decades of the nineteenth century was characterized by a rhetoric of pathos and suffering which, for all its righteous concern about the need for reform and uplift, did little to critique British colonialism or to distance The Cause from it. Indeed, it might be said that Victorian feminists were at pains to announce their own "wounded attachments" to the Empire through their sympathy for its colonial subjects - an identification which signaled their commitments to the colonial nation-state as well.

AB - Afro-Caribbean slaves, Indian prostitutes and non-western women more generally from the 1860s to the First World War.3 When Brown's "states of injury" argument is viewed in this long historical context - one which makes visible the impact of colonial ideologies on Western feminist movements - it enables us more fully to appreciate why many late-Victorian feminists tried to negotiate discourses of imperialism which excluded them from formal political participation in the imperial state even as they legitimated women's social and above all racial contributions to the colonial enterprise. For with its twin emphases on the subjection of "native" peoples and the investment of British feminists in their pathetic plight, imperial feminism in the last decades of the nineteenth century was characterized by a rhetoric of pathos and suffering which, for all its righteous concern about the need for reform and uplift, did little to critique British colonialism or to distance The Cause from it. Indeed, it might be said that Victorian feminists were at pains to announce their own "wounded attachments" to the Empire through their sympathy for its colonial subjects - an identification which signaled their commitments to the colonial nation-state as well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076295081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076295081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780203714638-10

DO - 10.4324/9780203714638-10

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85076295081

SN - 041520805X

SN - 9781138007338

SP - 18

EP - 32

BT - Women's Suffrage in the British Empire

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -