TY - GEN
T1 - State-to-state and direct molecular simulation study of energy transfer and dissociation in nitrogen mixtures
AU - Macdonald, Robyn L.
AU - Grover, Maninder S.
AU - Schwartzentruber, Thomas E.
AU - Panesi, Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - This work presents a comparison of the non-equilibrium energy transfer and dissociation of nitrogen molecules using two different approaches: the Direct Molecular Simulation (DMS) method and the State-to-State (StS) method. The two methods are used to study the thermochemical relaxation in a zero-dimensional isochoric and isothermal reactor. Both methods make use of the same potential energy surface (PES) for the N2(1Σ+g) − N(4Su) system taken from the NASA Ames quantum chemistry database. The DMS method is a stochastic method, which relies on sampling scattering calculations to directly determine the non-equilibrium evolution of a gas. In contrast, the StS model is a deterministic approach which relies on a complete kinetic database to directly solve the master equation for each internal energy state. The analysis reveals several differences between the two approaches. First, because of the reliance on sampling in the DMS method, accurately predicting the population of high energy states is difficult and subject to statistical error. Moreover, the DMS method does not map post-collision energies back to discrete states, meaning that distribution of states across energy is much smoother with this method. Despite the differences observed in the microscopic distribution, the macroscopic properties predicted by both methods agree well during both energy transfer and dissociation.
AB - This work presents a comparison of the non-equilibrium energy transfer and dissociation of nitrogen molecules using two different approaches: the Direct Molecular Simulation (DMS) method and the State-to-State (StS) method. The two methods are used to study the thermochemical relaxation in a zero-dimensional isochoric and isothermal reactor. Both methods make use of the same potential energy surface (PES) for the N2(1Σ+g) − N(4Su) system taken from the NASA Ames quantum chemistry database. The DMS method is a stochastic method, which relies on sampling scattering calculations to directly determine the non-equilibrium evolution of a gas. In contrast, the StS model is a deterministic approach which relies on a complete kinetic database to directly solve the master equation for each internal energy state. The analysis reveals several differences between the two approaches. First, because of the reliance on sampling in the DMS method, accurately predicting the population of high energy states is difficult and subject to statistical error. Moreover, the DMS method does not map post-collision energies back to discrete states, meaning that distribution of states across energy is much smoother with this method. Despite the differences observed in the microscopic distribution, the macroscopic properties predicted by both methods agree well during both energy transfer and dissociation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141588330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141588330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2018-0239
DO - 10.2514/6.2018-0239
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85141588330
SN - 9781624105241
T3 - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018
BT - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018
Y2 - 8 January 2018 through 12 January 2018
ER -