State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time

Jennifer A Delaney, William R. Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers the role of higher education in state budgets. It empirically models and tests the balance wheel hypothesis in a robust framework. The balance wheel model posits that in good economic times, higher education is an attractive area for states to fund and tends to be funded at a higher rate than other state budget categories. In bad economic times, the reverse is true. Higher education is often one of the first state budget categories to be cut, and it is cut more than other state budget categories due in part to its ability to raise outside revenue by charging tuition. This article expands upon previous work on the non-linear balance wheel model by including extensive controls for the economic, political, and higher education characteristics of each state. It finds evidence, robust to alternative specifications, of the balance wheel model over the time period from 1985-2004.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-369
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Education Finance
Volume36
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

budget
education
economics
revenue
time
Testing
State budget
ability
evidence
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration
  • Finance

Cite this

State spending on higher education : Testing the balance wheel over time. / Delaney, Jennifer A; Doyle, William R.

In: Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2011, p. 343-369.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ade53b92aa8f41f78f6a49aef4ce6eb6,
title = "State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time",
abstract = "This article considers the role of higher education in state budgets. It empirically models and tests the balance wheel hypothesis in a robust framework. The balance wheel model posits that in good economic times, higher education is an attractive area for states to fund and tends to be funded at a higher rate than other state budget categories. In bad economic times, the reverse is true. Higher education is often one of the first state budget categories to be cut, and it is cut more than other state budget categories due in part to its ability to raise outside revenue by charging tuition. This article expands upon previous work on the non-linear balance wheel model by including extensive controls for the economic, political, and higher education characteristics of each state. It finds evidence, robust to alternative specifications, of the balance wheel model over the time period from 1985-2004.",
author = "Delaney, {Jennifer A} and Doyle, {William R.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "343--369",
journal = "Journal of Education Finance",
issn = "0098-9495",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State spending on higher education

T2 - Testing the balance wheel over time

AU - Delaney, Jennifer A

AU - Doyle, William R.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article considers the role of higher education in state budgets. It empirically models and tests the balance wheel hypothesis in a robust framework. The balance wheel model posits that in good economic times, higher education is an attractive area for states to fund and tends to be funded at a higher rate than other state budget categories. In bad economic times, the reverse is true. Higher education is often one of the first state budget categories to be cut, and it is cut more than other state budget categories due in part to its ability to raise outside revenue by charging tuition. This article expands upon previous work on the non-linear balance wheel model by including extensive controls for the economic, political, and higher education characteristics of each state. It finds evidence, robust to alternative specifications, of the balance wheel model over the time period from 1985-2004.

AB - This article considers the role of higher education in state budgets. It empirically models and tests the balance wheel hypothesis in a robust framework. The balance wheel model posits that in good economic times, higher education is an attractive area for states to fund and tends to be funded at a higher rate than other state budget categories. In bad economic times, the reverse is true. Higher education is often one of the first state budget categories to be cut, and it is cut more than other state budget categories due in part to its ability to raise outside revenue by charging tuition. This article expands upon previous work on the non-linear balance wheel model by including extensive controls for the economic, political, and higher education characteristics of each state. It finds evidence, robust to alternative specifications, of the balance wheel model over the time period from 1985-2004.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052183709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052183709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052183709

VL - 36

SP - 343

EP - 369

JO - Journal of Education Finance

JF - Journal of Education Finance

SN - 0098-9495

IS - 4

ER -