Standardized verification of the CYCLUS fuel cycle simulator

Jin Whan Bae, Joshua L. Peterson-Droogh, Kathryn D Huff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many nuclear fuel cycle simulators can analyze transitions from once-through to advanced nuclear fuel cycles. Verification studies compare various fuel cycle analysis tools to test agreement and identify sources of difference. A recent verification study, Feng et al. (2016) established transition scenario test case specifications and accordingly evaluated national laboratory nuclear fuel cycle simulators, DYMOND, VISION, ORION, and MARKAL. This work verifies the performance of CYCLUS, the agent-based, open-source fuel cycle simulator, using the test case specifications in Feng et. al. In this work, CYCLUS demonstrates agreement with the results from the previous verification study. Minor differences reflect intentional, detailed material tracking in the CYCAMORE reactor module. These results extend the example results in Feng et al. to further enable future verification of additional nuclear fuel cycle simulation tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-291
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Energy
Volume128
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Nuclear fuels
Simulators
Specifications

Keywords

  • CYCLUS
  • Nuclear fuel cycle
  • Simulation
  • Verification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Cite this

Standardized verification of the CYCLUS fuel cycle simulator. / Bae, Jin Whan; Peterson-Droogh, Joshua L.; Huff, Kathryn D.

In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 128, 06.2019, p. 288-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bae, Jin Whan ; Peterson-Droogh, Joshua L. ; Huff, Kathryn D. / Standardized verification of the CYCLUS fuel cycle simulator. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2019 ; Vol. 128. pp. 288-291.
@article{b1de963a6aa54fb2b69121dc6c6bae5b,
title = "Standardized verification of the CYCLUS fuel cycle simulator",
abstract = "Many nuclear fuel cycle simulators can analyze transitions from once-through to advanced nuclear fuel cycles. Verification studies compare various fuel cycle analysis tools to test agreement and identify sources of difference. A recent verification study, Feng et al. (2016) established transition scenario test case specifications and accordingly evaluated national laboratory nuclear fuel cycle simulators, DYMOND, VISION, ORION, and MARKAL. This work verifies the performance of CYCLUS, the agent-based, open-source fuel cycle simulator, using the test case specifications in Feng et. al. In this work, CYCLUS demonstrates agreement with the results from the previous verification study. Minor differences reflect intentional, detailed material tracking in the CYCAMORE reactor module. These results extend the example results in Feng et al. to further enable future verification of additional nuclear fuel cycle simulation tools.",
keywords = "CYCLUS, Nuclear fuel cycle, Simulation, Verification",
author = "Bae, {Jin Whan} and Peterson-Droogh, {Joshua L.} and Huff, {Kathryn D}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "288--291",
journal = "Annals of Nuclear Energy",
issn = "0306-4549",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardized verification of the CYCLUS fuel cycle simulator

AU - Bae, Jin Whan

AU - Peterson-Droogh, Joshua L.

AU - Huff, Kathryn D

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Many nuclear fuel cycle simulators can analyze transitions from once-through to advanced nuclear fuel cycles. Verification studies compare various fuel cycle analysis tools to test agreement and identify sources of difference. A recent verification study, Feng et al. (2016) established transition scenario test case specifications and accordingly evaluated national laboratory nuclear fuel cycle simulators, DYMOND, VISION, ORION, and MARKAL. This work verifies the performance of CYCLUS, the agent-based, open-source fuel cycle simulator, using the test case specifications in Feng et. al. In this work, CYCLUS demonstrates agreement with the results from the previous verification study. Minor differences reflect intentional, detailed material tracking in the CYCAMORE reactor module. These results extend the example results in Feng et al. to further enable future verification of additional nuclear fuel cycle simulation tools.

AB - Many nuclear fuel cycle simulators can analyze transitions from once-through to advanced nuclear fuel cycles. Verification studies compare various fuel cycle analysis tools to test agreement and identify sources of difference. A recent verification study, Feng et al. (2016) established transition scenario test case specifications and accordingly evaluated national laboratory nuclear fuel cycle simulators, DYMOND, VISION, ORION, and MARKAL. This work verifies the performance of CYCLUS, the agent-based, open-source fuel cycle simulator, using the test case specifications in Feng et. al. In this work, CYCLUS demonstrates agreement with the results from the previous verification study. Minor differences reflect intentional, detailed material tracking in the CYCAMORE reactor module. These results extend the example results in Feng et al. to further enable future verification of additional nuclear fuel cycle simulation tools.

KW - CYCLUS

KW - Nuclear fuel cycle

KW - Simulation

KW - Verification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060191630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060191630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.01.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060191630

VL - 128

SP - 288

EP - 291

JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy

JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy

SN - 0306-4549

ER -