TY - GEN
T1 - Spray characteristics and flame structure of jet A and alternative jet fuels
AU - Mayhew, Eric
AU - Mitsinga, Constandinos
AU - McGann, Brendan
AU - Lee, Tonghun
AU - Hendershott, Tyler
AU - Stouffer, Scott
AU - Wrzesinski, Paul
AU - Caswell, Andrew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - A 2D phase Doppler anemometer is used to characterize alternative jet fuel droplets and compare them to Jet A fuel droplets in the National Jet Fuel Combustion Program referee single cup combustor near lean blowout. The two alternative jet fuels selected were chosen for their unusual properties: one with low cetane number and one with a flat boiling curve. Measurements are made on all three fuels at steady-state combustion at a pressure of 30 psia, swirler pressure drop of 3 percent, and a global equivalence ratio of 0.096. The results show differences in the droplet diameter distributions of the different fuels. This is particularly prominent in the flat boiling curve fuel, which has a Sauter mean diameter between 12 and 37 microns larger than the corresponding points for the other two fuels. OH* chemiluminescence imaging, conducted at 20kHz, is used to compare flame structures between the fuels as well as to correlate spray characteristics to flame location. The averaged OH* images show significant differences between the flame structures of the three fuels. The results of the study motivate further investigation into the correlation between alternative jet fuel spray characteristics and flame behavior for use in evaluating and predicting alternative jet fuel performance.
AB - A 2D phase Doppler anemometer is used to characterize alternative jet fuel droplets and compare them to Jet A fuel droplets in the National Jet Fuel Combustion Program referee single cup combustor near lean blowout. The two alternative jet fuels selected were chosen for their unusual properties: one with low cetane number and one with a flat boiling curve. Measurements are made on all three fuels at steady-state combustion at a pressure of 30 psia, swirler pressure drop of 3 percent, and a global equivalence ratio of 0.096. The results show differences in the droplet diameter distributions of the different fuels. This is particularly prominent in the flat boiling curve fuel, which has a Sauter mean diameter between 12 and 37 microns larger than the corresponding points for the other two fuels. OH* chemiluminescence imaging, conducted at 20kHz, is used to compare flame structures between the fuels as well as to correlate spray characteristics to flame location. The averaged OH* images show significant differences between the flame structures of the three fuels. The results of the study motivate further investigation into the correlation between alternative jet fuel spray characteristics and flame behavior for use in evaluating and predicting alternative jet fuel performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017228553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017228553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2017-0148
DO - 10.2514/6.2017-0148
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85017228553
T3 - AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
T2 - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
Y2 - 9 January 2017 through 13 January 2017
ER -