Spatial variation among green building certification categories: Does place matter? A rejoinder to Pushkar

Julie L Cidell; Alex Beata

doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002

Spatial variation among green building certification categories: Does place matter? A rejoinder to Pushkar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In a comment on an earlier article (Cidell & Beata, 2009) in this journal, Pushkar (2013) critiqued our use of the one-way ANOVA test for distinguishing among different LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design) credits being earned by buildings being certified as green in different U.S. regions. Her criticism is based on dependencies existing among the categories of LEED credits. However, we argue that in both conceptual and empirical terms, such dependencies are not a concern, and therefore our original results demonstrating the importance of regional differences in green buildings should stand.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	121-122
Number of pages	2
Journal	Landscape and Urban Planning
Volume	112
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002
State	Published - Apr 2013

Keywords

ANOVA
Green buildings
LEED

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Ecology
Nature and Landscape Conservation
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Online availability

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

@article{8b0a8b75e67e447d8b1814f5067df3af,

title = "Spatial variation among green building certification categories: Does place matter? A rejoinder to Pushkar",

abstract = "In a comment on an earlier article (Cidell & Beata, 2009) in this journal, Pushkar (2013) critiqued our use of the one-way ANOVA test for distinguishing among different LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design) credits being earned by buildings being certified as green in different U.S. regions. Her criticism is based on dependencies existing among the categories of LEED credits. However, we argue that in both conceptual and empirical terms, such dependencies are not a concern, and therefore our original results demonstrating the importance of regional differences in green buildings should stand.",

keywords = "ANOVA, Green buildings, LEED",

author = "Cidell, {Julie L} and Alex Beata",

year = "2013",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "112",

pages = "121--122",

journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",

issn = "0169-2046",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial variation among green building certification categories

T2 - Does place matter? A rejoinder to Pushkar

AU - Cidell, Julie L

AU - Beata, Alex

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - In a comment on an earlier article (Cidell & Beata, 2009) in this journal, Pushkar (2013) critiqued our use of the one-way ANOVA test for distinguishing among different LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design) credits being earned by buildings being certified as green in different U.S. regions. Her criticism is based on dependencies existing among the categories of LEED credits. However, we argue that in both conceptual and empirical terms, such dependencies are not a concern, and therefore our original results demonstrating the importance of regional differences in green buildings should stand.

AB - In a comment on an earlier article (Cidell & Beata, 2009) in this journal, Pushkar (2013) critiqued our use of the one-way ANOVA test for distinguishing among different LEED (leadership in energy and environmental design) credits being earned by buildings being certified as green in different U.S. regions. Her criticism is based on dependencies existing among the categories of LEED credits. However, we argue that in both conceptual and empirical terms, such dependencies are not a concern, and therefore our original results demonstrating the importance of regional differences in green buildings should stand.

KW - ANOVA

KW - Green buildings

KW - LEED

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875260271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875260271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.002

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84875260271

SN - 0169-2046

VL - 112

SP - 121

EP - 122

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

IS - 1

ER -

Spatial variation among green building certification categories: Does place matter? A rejoinder to Pushkar

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this