TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial Mapping in Preschoolers
T2 - Close Comparisons Facilitate Far Mappings
AU - Loewenstein, Jeffrey
AU - Gentner, Dedre
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant SBR– 9720313 and National Science Foundation–Learning and Intelligent Systems Grant SBR–9511757 to Dedre Gentner. We are grateful for the financial support provided by William T. Grant Foundation Award 95167795. We thank Patricia Bauer, Zhe Chen, and Nora Newcombe for their thoughtful comments on the article. We also thank David Uttal, Judy DeLoache, Mark Blades, Phillip Wolff, and the Analogy and Similarity group at Northwestern University for helpful discussions of the issues presented in this article.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - To test the hypothesis that comparison processes facilitate schema extraction, we studied the effect of making comparisons on 3-year-olds' ability to perform mapping tasks. In 3 studies, children were tested on their ability to find ahidden toy in a model room after being shown its location in a perceptually different room. In Experiment 1 we found that seeing 2 similar hiding events - permitting a sequential comparison - improved 3-year-olds' performance on the mapping task. Experiment 2 showed a more striking effect: Simply comparing the initial hiding model with another nearly identical model helped children to succeed on the subsequent mapping task. Experiment 3 showed that the comparison effect was not simply due to an opportunity to interact with 2 examples, but was specific to comparing them. We conclude that comparing examples can facilitate children's noticing common relational schemas - in this case, a spatial relational schema - and their ability to use this system of relations in subsequent tasks. Our central hypothesis is that the process of comparison is a major force in children's learning and development. In this work, we test the specific claim that drawing comparisons among similar spatial arrays fosters insight into the common spatial relations, as assessed in a subsequent spatial mapping task.
AB - To test the hypothesis that comparison processes facilitate schema extraction, we studied the effect of making comparisons on 3-year-olds' ability to perform mapping tasks. In 3 studies, children were tested on their ability to find ahidden toy in a model room after being shown its location in a perceptually different room. In Experiment 1 we found that seeing 2 similar hiding events - permitting a sequential comparison - improved 3-year-olds' performance on the mapping task. Experiment 2 showed a more striking effect: Simply comparing the initial hiding model with another nearly identical model helped children to succeed on the subsequent mapping task. Experiment 3 showed that the comparison effect was not simply due to an opportunity to interact with 2 examples, but was specific to comparing them. We conclude that comparing examples can facilitate children's noticing common relational schemas - in this case, a spatial relational schema - and their ability to use this system of relations in subsequent tasks. Our central hypothesis is that the process of comparison is a major force in children's learning and development. In this work, we test the specific claim that drawing comparisons among similar spatial arrays fosters insight into the common spatial relations, as assessed in a subsequent spatial mapping task.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037493804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037493804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/S15327647JCD0202_4
DO - 10.1207/S15327647JCD0202_4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0037493804
SN - 1524-8372
VL - 2
SP - 189
EP - 219
JO - Journal of Cognition and Development
JF - Journal of Cognition and Development
IS - 2
ER -