Abstract
Teacher compensation is often deferred until late in teachers’ careers. Concerns about teacher shortages have raised concerns that backloading compensation in this way is inefficient. However, existing theoretical and empirical work does not clearly explain why these compensation structures often persist. Using detailed longitudinal teacher compensation data and spatial autoregressive models, I test two of the most common explanations for deferred teacher compensation. I find little evidence that school districts strategically frontload compensation to compete for teachers. However, I find evidence consistent with deferred compensation resulting at least in part from the influence of teachers’ unions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 71-90 |
Journal | Labor Studies Journal |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | Dec 5 2024 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- deferred compensation
- public sector workers
- teacher compensation
- teacher labor markets
- teachers’ unions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Industrial relations
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial explanations for deferred teacher compensation: Unions and competition for teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Media Coverage of: Spatial Explanations for Deferred Teacher Compensation: Unions and Competition for Teachers
1/16/25
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media: Press / Media