TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial drivers of wetland bird occupancy within an urbanized matrix in the Upper Midwestern United States
AU - Rahlin, Anastasia A.
AU - Saunders, Sarah P.
AU - Beilke, Stephanie
N1 - We thank the following individuals and organizations for assistance with fieldwork: Matt Beatty, Donnai Casillas, Carly Conley, Joe Drexler, Victor Duda, Kim Ehn, Cookie Ferguson, Jessica Gomez, Carol Goodall, Lindsay Grossman, Gregory Hejnar, Aqsa Junagadhwala, Libby Keyes, Sammi King, Travis Kuntzelman, Paul Labus, Vera Leopold, Emma Lord, Dan Lory, Barb Lucas, Walter Marcisz, Shari McCollough, Michael McNamee, Lauren Nassef, Dick Niemi, Joel Perez, Michael Topp, Alison Világ, Edward Warden, Kristian Wielunski, Ken Wilson, Dunes-Calumet Audubon Society, Indiana Audubon Society, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Indiana University Northwest, Shirley Heinze Land Trust, South Bend-Elkhart Audubon Society, and The Nature Conservancy. Anastasia A. Rahlin was supported by the funding from the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority under Bryan Wagner. Funders had no input into the content of the manuscript and did not require approval of this manuscript before submission or publication. Illinois wetland bird surveys were conducted under permits granted by the Chicago Park District, Forest Preserves of Cook, Lake, McHenry, and DuPage County, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Northeastern University, and the Illinois Nature Preserves Commission. Illinois wetland bird surveys were conducted under University of Illinois-approved IACUC Protocols (number 18191). Indiana wetland bird surveys were conducted under permit NP20-08 issued by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and permit INDU-2017-SCI-0025 issued by the US Department of the Interior National Park Service, Indiana Dunes.
We thank the following individuals and organizations for assistance with fieldwork: Matt Beatty, Donnai Casillas, Carly Conley, Joe Drexler, Victor Duda, Kim Ehn, Cookie Ferguson, Jessica Gomez, Carol Goodall, Lindsay Grossman, Gregory Hejnar, Aqsa Junagadhwala, Libby Keyes, Sammi King, Travis Kuntzelman, Paul Labus, Vera Leopold, Emma Lord, Dan Lory, Barb Lucas, Walter Marcisz, Shari McCollough, Michael McNamee, Lauren Nassef, Dick Niemi, Joel Perez, Michael Topp, Alison Világ, Edward Warden, Kristian Wielunski, Ken Wilson, Dunes‐Calumet Audubon Society, Indiana Audubon Society, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Indiana University Northwest, Shirley Heinze Land Trust, South Bend‐Elkhart Audubon Society, and The Nature Conservancy. Anastasia A. Rahlin was supported by the funding from the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority under Bryan Wagner. Funders had no input into the content of the manuscript and did not require approval of this manuscript before submission or publication. Illinois wetland bird surveys were conducted under permits granted by the Chicago Park District, Forest Preserves of Cook, Lake, McHenry, and DuPage County, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Northeastern University, and the Illinois Nature Preserves Commission. Illinois wetland bird surveys were conducted under University of Illinois‐approved IACUC Protocols (number 18191). Indiana wetland bird surveys were conducted under permit NP20‐08 issued by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and permit INDU‐2017‐SCI‐0025 issued by the US Department of the Interior National Park Service, Indiana Dunes.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Wetland birds are undergoing severe population declines in North America, with habitat degradation and wetland loss considered two of the primary causes. Due to the cryptic nature of many wetland bird species, the ecological conditions (e.g., matrix composition) that influence bird occupancy, and the relevant spatial scales at which to measure bird responses, remain unclear but may affect inference about wetland use and suitability. We conducted wetland bird surveys at 477 points across northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana within the highly urbanized landscape surrounding Chicago. Using remotely sensed land cover data, we built occupancy models for 10 wetland bird species (American Coot Fulica americana, Black-crowned Night-Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Blue-winged Teal Anas discors, Common Gallinule Gallinula galeata, Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis, Marsh Wren Cistothorus palustris, Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps, Sora Porzana carolina, Swamp Sparrow Melospiza georgiana, and Virginia Rail Rallus limicola) to quantify their responses to wetland cover types (emergent wetland, forested wetland, riverine wetland, and freshwater pond) and urbanization at four spatial scales (200-, 400-, 800-, and 2000-m radial distances). We also included the distance to Lake Michigan as a covariate in occupancy models to account for ecological differences between coastal and inland wetlands. We found that relationships between land cover types and occupancy differed by species, as did the spatial scale of support. Generally, the presence of emergent wetlands or ponds at immediate (200 m) and local (400 m) spatial scales within the surrounding matrix was positively associated with wetland bird occupancy. Contrary to expectations, we did not find support for a negative relationship between urbanization and occupancy for most focal species, indicating that birds are using available wetland habitats despite surrounding development. While future research should evaluate management strategies at the watershed scale, our findings suggest that wetland conservation planning at immediate and local scales is likely to promote bird habitat use within highly modified landscapes of the Upper Midwestern United States.
AB - Wetland birds are undergoing severe population declines in North America, with habitat degradation and wetland loss considered two of the primary causes. Due to the cryptic nature of many wetland bird species, the ecological conditions (e.g., matrix composition) that influence bird occupancy, and the relevant spatial scales at which to measure bird responses, remain unclear but may affect inference about wetland use and suitability. We conducted wetland bird surveys at 477 points across northeastern Illinois and northwestern Indiana within the highly urbanized landscape surrounding Chicago. Using remotely sensed land cover data, we built occupancy models for 10 wetland bird species (American Coot Fulica americana, Black-crowned Night-Heron Nycticorax nycticorax, Blue-winged Teal Anas discors, Common Gallinule Gallinula galeata, Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis, Marsh Wren Cistothorus palustris, Pied-billed Grebe Podilymbus podiceps, Sora Porzana carolina, Swamp Sparrow Melospiza georgiana, and Virginia Rail Rallus limicola) to quantify their responses to wetland cover types (emergent wetland, forested wetland, riverine wetland, and freshwater pond) and urbanization at four spatial scales (200-, 400-, 800-, and 2000-m radial distances). We also included the distance to Lake Michigan as a covariate in occupancy models to account for ecological differences between coastal and inland wetlands. We found that relationships between land cover types and occupancy differed by species, as did the spatial scale of support. Generally, the presence of emergent wetlands or ponds at immediate (200 m) and local (400 m) spatial scales within the surrounding matrix was positively associated with wetland bird occupancy. Contrary to expectations, we did not find support for a negative relationship between urbanization and occupancy for most focal species, indicating that birds are using available wetland habitats despite surrounding development. While future research should evaluate management strategies at the watershed scale, our findings suggest that wetland conservation planning at immediate and local scales is likely to promote bird habitat use within highly modified landscapes of the Upper Midwestern United States.
KW - emergent wetland
KW - wetland birds
KW - urbanization
KW - occupancy
KW - Great Lakes region
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139161215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139161215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.4232
DO - 10.1002/ecs2.4232
M3 - Article
SN - 2150-8925
VL - 13
JO - Ecosphere
JF - Ecosphere
IS - 9
M1 - e4232
ER -