Abstract
Preference heterogeneity among landowners managing transboundary resources can determine the production of externalities across their lands. I test this hypothesis in the context of an invasive species affecting two forest landowners, where one values their property for recreation and the other produces timber. Using a spatially explicit first-mover repeated game, I find that the social cost of the externality is greatest when a bioinvasion starts on the recreation property. Except for species with fast long-distance dispersal, the optimal subsidy is nonuniform, targeting the landowner who acts as the weaker link, regardless of where a bioinvasion starts.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 262-283 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Land Economics |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | Dec 13 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial Bioinvasion Externalities with Heterogeneous Landowner Preferences: A Two-Agent Bioeconomic Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS