@article{37d74fb4ef644d98be3f1b467ae46ca3,
title = "Soybean photosynthetic and biomass responses to carbon dioxide concentrations ranging from pre-industrial to the distant future",
abstract = "Increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) directly impacts C3 plant photosynthesis and productivity, and the rate at which [CO2] is increasing is greater than initially predicted by worst-case scenario climate models. Thus, it is increasingly important to assess the physiological responses of C3 plants, especially those that serve as important crops, to [CO2] beyond the mid-range levels used in traditional experiments. Here, we grew the C3 crop soybean (Glycine max) at eight different [CO2] levels spanning subambient (340 ppm) to the highest level thought plausible (~2000 ppm) in chambers for 5 weeks. Physiological development was delayed and plant height and total leaf area increased at [CO2] levels higher than ambient conditions, with very little difference in these parameters among the elevated [CO2] treatments >900 ppm. Daily photosynthesis initially increased with rising [CO2] but began to level off at ~1000 ppm CO2. Similar results occurred in biomass accumulation. Thus, as [CO2] continues to match or exceed the worst-case emission scenarios, these results indicate that carbon gain, growth, and potentially yield increases will diminish, thereby ultimately constraining the positive impact that continuing increases in atmospheric [CO2] could have on crop productivity and global terrestrial carbon sinks.",
keywords = "Biomass, elevated CO, photosynthesis, soybean (Glycine max)",
author = "Drag, {David W.} and Rebecca Slattery and Matthew Siebers and Delucia, {Evan H.} and Ort, {Donald R.} and Bernacchi, {Carl J.}",
note = "Funding Information: We would like to acknowledge everyone who made this experiment a success.A special thanks to Tim Mies who originally built the chambers and aided with updating and controlling the environmental parameters, Chris Montes for helping with the night-long respiration measurements, Robert Koester who helped with leaf area and the destructive harvest, and Ursula Ruiz-Vera who aided with data processing and analysis. We greatly appreciate all your help and support with this study. This research was funded by the Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit of the US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/jxb/eraa133",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "3690--3700",
journal = "Journal of experimental botany",
issn = "0022-0957",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "12",
}