TY - JOUR
T1 - Soybean management for seed composition
T2 - The perspective of U.S. farmers
AU - Borja Reis, Andre F.
AU - Rosso, Luiz
AU - Davidson, Dan
AU - Kovács, Péter
AU - Purcell, Larry C.
AU - Below, Frederick E.
AU - Casteel, Shaun
AU - Kandel, Hans J.
AU - Naeve, Seth
AU - Archontoulis, Sotirios V.
AU - Ciampitti, Ignacio A.
N1 - Funding Information:
United Soybean Board funded this research (project no. 2020‐152‐0104). We appreciate the collaboration of all farmers for the time dedicated to providing insightful data to obtain a relevant and current picture of the overall status of U.S. soybean seed quality. In addition, we want to extend a most sincere appreciation to all the relevant stakeholders that provided critical assistance on disseminating and facilitating the survey.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Agronomy Journal © 2022 American Society of Agronomy.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - The soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] compositional quality is mainly provided by the seed concentration of protein and oil. These traits are critical for sustaining global use, and although there is demand for high protein soybean, no mechanism to differentiate production is in place. At the opposite end of the supply chain, farmers are remunerated on a mass basis without having any incentive regarding seed composition. This study evaluated farmers' perspectives and knowledge on soybean quality and their propensity to adopt quality improvement technologies. Farmers from the main U.S. producing regions (n = 271) were investigated with a self-administrated survey containing 21 questions during 2020 and 2021. Our results show that 84% are unaware of the current protein and oil levels from their own production. A small portion (1.4%) make management decisions (e.g., choice of genotypes or monitor quality) based on the implications on seed quality. However, practices already in place are likely to enhance the quality of seed, namely N nutrition (via rhizobia [12.9%] or fertilizer [5.9%]) and late-season crop protection (17.1%). If farmers are financially rewarded by US$0.50 per bushel, a mindset change may occur. Based on these results, we concluded that shifts in the U.S. production system targeting protein or oil markets are possible, and the constraints are mainly related to on-farm management. However, the challenges for improving the U.S. soybean competitiveness in global or niche markets also rely upon other segments of the production chain, specifically breeders, technology suppliers, and logistical structure.
AB - The soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] compositional quality is mainly provided by the seed concentration of protein and oil. These traits are critical for sustaining global use, and although there is demand for high protein soybean, no mechanism to differentiate production is in place. At the opposite end of the supply chain, farmers are remunerated on a mass basis without having any incentive regarding seed composition. This study evaluated farmers' perspectives and knowledge on soybean quality and their propensity to adopt quality improvement technologies. Farmers from the main U.S. producing regions (n = 271) were investigated with a self-administrated survey containing 21 questions during 2020 and 2021. Our results show that 84% are unaware of the current protein and oil levels from their own production. A small portion (1.4%) make management decisions (e.g., choice of genotypes or monitor quality) based on the implications on seed quality. However, practices already in place are likely to enhance the quality of seed, namely N nutrition (via rhizobia [12.9%] or fertilizer [5.9%]) and late-season crop protection (17.1%). If farmers are financially rewarded by US$0.50 per bushel, a mindset change may occur. Based on these results, we concluded that shifts in the U.S. production system targeting protein or oil markets are possible, and the constraints are mainly related to on-farm management. However, the challenges for improving the U.S. soybean competitiveness in global or niche markets also rely upon other segments of the production chain, specifically breeders, technology suppliers, and logistical structure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132367473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132367473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/agj2.21082
DO - 10.1002/agj2.21082
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85132367473
SN - 0002-1962
VL - 114
SP - 2608
EP - 2617
JO - Journal of Production Agriculture
JF - Journal of Production Agriculture
IS - 4
ER -