SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.

MATTHEW W. FINKIN

SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	11-53
Number of pages	43
Journal	Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal
Volume	14
Issue number	1
State	Published - Feb 1 2010

Keywords

Right of privacy
Employees
Labor laws & legislation
Employment policy
United States
Europe

Access to Document

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1580058

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

FINKIN, MATTHEW. W. (2010). SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY. Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 14(1), 11-53. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1580058

@article{0ad40cbc136a4876b9abcc8944a7cb33,

title = "SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.",

abstract = "The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.",

keywords = "Right of privacy, Employees, Labor laws & legislation, Employment policy, United States, Europe",

author = "FINKIN, {MATTHEW W.}",

year = "2010",

month = feb,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "14",

pages = "11--53",

journal = "Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal",

issn = "1522-2225",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.

AU - FINKIN, MATTHEW W.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.

AB - The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.

KW - Right of privacy

KW - Employees

KW - Labor laws & legislation

KW - Employment policy

KW - United States

KW - Europe

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 11

EP - 53

JO - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

JF - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

SN - 1522-2225

IS - 1

ER -