SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.

MATTHEW W. FINKIN

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-53
Number of pages43
JournalEmployee Rights & Employment Policy Journal
Volume14
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Fingerprint

privacy
employee
Law
legal theory
monitoring

Keywords

  • Right of privacy
  • Employees
  • Labor laws & legislation
  • Employment policy
  • United States
  • Europe

Cite this

SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY. / FINKIN, MATTHEW W.

In: Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 11-53.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

FINKIN, MATTHEWW 2010, 'SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.', Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 11-53.
FINKIN MATTHEWW. SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY. Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal. 2010 Feb 1;14(1):11-53.
FINKIN, MATTHEW W. / SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY. In: Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 11-53.
@article{0ad40cbc136a4876b9abcc8944a7cb33,
title = "SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.",
abstract = "The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.",
keywords = "Right of privacy, Employees, Labor laws & legislation, Employment policy, United States, Europe",
author = "FINKIN, {MATTHEW W.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "11--53",
journal = "Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal",
issn = "1522-2225",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SOME FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE USEFULNESS OF COMPARATIVISM IN THE LAW OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY.

AU - FINKIN, MATTHEW W.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.

AB - The article discusses the role of comparativism in the law of employee privacy. It describes situations in comparative perspective such as the presentation of self, intimate association, and biometric monitoring. James Whitman provides a critique of the idea of privacy as a basis for a legal theory. He argues that privacy advocates downplay the differences of the law of privacy between the U.S. and Europe.

KW - Right of privacy

KW - Employees

KW - Labor laws & legislation

KW - Employment policy

KW - United States

KW - Europe

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 11

EP - 53

JO - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

JF - Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal

SN - 1522-2225

IS - 1

ER -

Access to Document