SOLUTIONS TO THE PARADIGM CONFLICT:: Coping with Uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conflict between the quantitative and qualitative inquiry paradigms is ineluctable. Six solutions for resolving the conflict—denial, co-optation, supremacy, replacement, primacy of method, and anarchism—are reviewed and found wanting. In this article I propose that inquirers must choose an inquiry paradigm that is resonant with the values they wish to promote in the conduct of educational inquiry. I defend this modest proposal by examining the values expressed in inquiry paradigms and explain how one chooses an inquiry paradigm to achieve a state of value fit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-407
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Contemporary Ethnography
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

coping
replacement
uncertainty
paradigm
Values
conflict
method
Paradigm
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

SOLUTIONS TO THE PARADIGM CONFLICT:: Coping with Uncertainty. / Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.1989, p. 379-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf2adeb752214773bed4f3fc9b190d8b,
title = "SOLUTIONS TO THE PARADIGM CONFLICT:: Coping with Uncertainty",
abstract = "Conflict between the quantitative and qualitative inquiry paradigms is ineluctable. Six solutions for resolving the conflict—denial, co-optation, supremacy, replacement, primacy of method, and anarchism—are reviewed and found wanting. In this article I propose that inquirers must choose an inquiry paradigm that is resonant with the values they wish to promote in the conduct of educational inquiry. I defend this modest proposal by examining the values expressed in inquiry paradigms and explain how one chooses an inquiry paradigm to achieve a state of value fit.",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/089124189017004001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "379--407",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Ethnography",
issn = "0891-2416",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SOLUTIONS TO THE PARADIGM CONFLICT:: Coping with Uncertainty

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A

PY - 1989/1

Y1 - 1989/1

N2 - Conflict between the quantitative and qualitative inquiry paradigms is ineluctable. Six solutions for resolving the conflict—denial, co-optation, supremacy, replacement, primacy of method, and anarchism—are reviewed and found wanting. In this article I propose that inquirers must choose an inquiry paradigm that is resonant with the values they wish to promote in the conduct of educational inquiry. I defend this modest proposal by examining the values expressed in inquiry paradigms and explain how one chooses an inquiry paradigm to achieve a state of value fit.

AB - Conflict between the quantitative and qualitative inquiry paradigms is ineluctable. Six solutions for resolving the conflict—denial, co-optation, supremacy, replacement, primacy of method, and anarchism—are reviewed and found wanting. In this article I propose that inquirers must choose an inquiry paradigm that is resonant with the values they wish to promote in the conduct of educational inquiry. I defend this modest proposal by examining the values expressed in inquiry paradigms and explain how one chooses an inquiry paradigm to achieve a state of value fit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970160036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970160036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/089124189017004001

DO - 10.1177/089124189017004001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970160036

VL - 17

SP - 379

EP - 407

JO - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

JF - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

SN - 0891-2416

IS - 4

ER -