Abstract
The forecasting content of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Commitments of Traders (COT) report is investigated. Bivariate Granger causality tests show very little evidence that traders' positions are useful in forecasting (leading) returns in 10 agricul-tural futures markets. However, there is substantial evidence that traders respond to price changes. In particular, noncommercial traders display a tendency for trend following. The other trader classifications display mixed styles, perhaps indicating those trader categories capture a variety of traders. The results generally do not support use of the COT data in predicting price movements in agricultural futures markets.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 276-296 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - Aug 2009 |
Keywords
- Agricultural futures markets
- Commitments of Traders
- Forecasting
- Prices
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Economics and Econometrics