TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation center accreditation and programmatic benchmarks
T2 - A review for emergency medicine
AU - Fernandez, Rosemarie
AU - Wang, Ernest
AU - Vozenilek, John A.
AU - Hayden, Emily
AU - McLaughlin, Steve
AU - Godwin, Steven A.
AU - Griswold-Theodorson, Sharon
AU - Davenport, Moira
AU - Gordon, James A.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Simulation-based education has grown significantly over the past 10 years. As a result, more professional organizations are developing or implementing accreditation processes to help define minimum standards and best practices in simulation-based training. However, the benefits and potential pitfalls of sponsoring and implementing such programs have yet to be fully evaluated across specialties. The board of directors of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) requested an evaluation of the potential to create an emergency medicine (EM)-based Simulation Consultation and Accreditation Service. In response to this request, the Simulation Accreditation and Consultation Work Group, a subgroup of the Committee on Technology in Medical Education (now Simulation Academy), was created. The work group was charged with: 1) reviewing current benchmarks and standards set by existing simulation accreditation programs; 2) analyzing current EM simulation program structures, including leadership, administrative, and financial components; and 3) proposing a potential model for EM-based simulation accreditation. This article outlines currently existing and proposed accreditation models and identifies components that support best practices. It then goes on to describe three general programmatic models to better understand how simulation training can be operationalized in EM. Finally, the work group uses this collective information to propose how an accreditation process, in concert with the SAEM Simulation Consultation Service, can enhance and advance EM simulation training.
AB - Simulation-based education has grown significantly over the past 10 years. As a result, more professional organizations are developing or implementing accreditation processes to help define minimum standards and best practices in simulation-based training. However, the benefits and potential pitfalls of sponsoring and implementing such programs have yet to be fully evaluated across specialties. The board of directors of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) requested an evaluation of the potential to create an emergency medicine (EM)-based Simulation Consultation and Accreditation Service. In response to this request, the Simulation Accreditation and Consultation Work Group, a subgroup of the Committee on Technology in Medical Education (now Simulation Academy), was created. The work group was charged with: 1) reviewing current benchmarks and standards set by existing simulation accreditation programs; 2) analyzing current EM simulation program structures, including leadership, administrative, and financial components; and 3) proposing a potential model for EM-based simulation accreditation. This article outlines currently existing and proposed accreditation models and identifies components that support best practices. It then goes on to describe three general programmatic models to better understand how simulation training can be operationalized in EM. Finally, the work group uses this collective information to propose how an accreditation process, in concert with the SAEM Simulation Consultation Service, can enhance and advance EM simulation training.
KW - accreditation
KW - medical education
KW - simulation
KW - standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649462491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649462491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00815.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00815.x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21040111
AN - SCOPUS:78649462491
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 17
SP - 1093
EP - 1103
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 10
ER -