Simpson’s paradox: A demographic case study of population dynamics, poverty, and inequality

Raphael Mendonça Guimarães, Flávia Cristina Drumond Andrade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Brazil is undergoing a demographic transition characterized by regional inequalities. It is reasonable to assume that aspects related to poverty, development and inequality might re-verse the sign of the association of indicators of demographic transition, exemplifying a phenom-enon known as Simpson’s Paradox. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of inequality, poverty and social development on population dynamics in Brazil, verifying the occurrence of Simpson’s paradox in demographic transition. We used population data from the 1991, 2000 and 2010 national censuses, broken down by age and federative unit (FU). The correlation between demographic indicators was assessed by stratifying the FUs into groups according to their median social indicators. The findings show that all FUs have progressed against social indicators and are undergoing demographic transition; however, de-spite reductions in disparities over the study pe-riod, persistent gaps exist between regions. Simp-son’s paradox was present when the analysis was carried out by census year and social indicators, and was particularly pronounced in 1991. The main challenge is to define how to analyze demographic dynamics in Brazil and understand how contextual factors alter the pace, quantum, and pattern of demographic transition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4453-4469
Number of pages17
JournalCiencia e Saude Coletiva
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Demographic transi-tion
  • Demography
  • Development
  • Inequality
  • Poverty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simpson’s paradox: A demographic case study of population dynamics, poverty, and inequality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this