TY - JOUR
T1 - Shifting Cattle Producer Beliefs on Stocking and Invasive Forage
T2 - Implications for Grassland Conservation
AU - Raynor, Edward J.
AU - Coon, Jaime J.
AU - Swartz, Timothy M.
AU - Morton, Lois Wright
AU - Schacht, Walter H.
AU - Miller, James R.
N1 - We thank C. van Riper for advice and support on survey design and implementation. S. Maresh Nelson and J. Rusk provided useful comments on drafts of the survey instrument. This work was supported by Sustainable Agriculture, Research, and Education, North-Central Region [ GSP15-038 ]. Partial support was provided by the Competitive State Wildlife Grants program [ U-D F14AP00012 ] in cooperation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program, and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [Hatch project, ILLU-875-918].
We thank C. van Riper for advice and support on survey design and implementation. S. Maresh Nelson and J. Rusk provided useful comments on drafts of the survey instrument. This work was supported by Sustainable Agriculture, Research, and Education, North-Central Region [GSP15-038]. Partial support was provided by the Competitive State Wildlife Grants program [U-D F14AP00012] in cooperation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program, and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [Hatch project, ILLU-875-918]. This work was supported by a graduate student grant from the Sustainable Agriculture, Research, and Education, North-Central Region (SARE) (GSP15-038), Illinois SARE small grants program, and National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Dept of Agriculture (2016-67019-25206, ILLU-875-918).
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - To advance the dialogue to define sustainable working landscapes, it is essential to include the perceptions, knowledge, and factors guiding decision making. We surveyed livestock producers in the Grand River Grasslands region of southern Iowa and northern Missouri, United States, to gain insight into key factors shaping decision making and perspectives on effective management practices in the eastern Great Plains, focusing in particular on demographic and social change and producer willingness to reduce stocking rate as a conservation practice. First, a longitudinal evaluation of livestock producer demographics in 2007 and 2017 revealed individuals were older and were renting grazing land to a greater extent than in 2007. Second, when making land management decisions, producers in 2017 focused on economic concerns more than environmental concerns compared with more balanced views in 2007. For those who prioritized the environment over economics, this prioritization was related to both higher levels of education and a willingness to reduce stocking rate (livestock production) if there is a positive conservation outcome. In contrast, a lower willingness to reduce stocking was associated with increasing rental acreage and prevalence of an invasive cool-season grass that responds favorably to heavy grazing (tall fescue, Schedonorus arundinaceus Schreb.). Regardless, about 37% of cattle producers representing ∼ 40% of the land area surveyed were at least moderately willing to reduce stocking rates to achieve a conservation outcome. In conclusion, our findings suggest that producers’ need to gain income from livestock may limit the willingness to enact a conservation practice similar to reduced stocking rates. However, there is clearly conservation receptiveness from a segment of the producer community, which indicates potential for improved conservation.
AB - To advance the dialogue to define sustainable working landscapes, it is essential to include the perceptions, knowledge, and factors guiding decision making. We surveyed livestock producers in the Grand River Grasslands region of southern Iowa and northern Missouri, United States, to gain insight into key factors shaping decision making and perspectives on effective management practices in the eastern Great Plains, focusing in particular on demographic and social change and producer willingness to reduce stocking rate as a conservation practice. First, a longitudinal evaluation of livestock producer demographics in 2007 and 2017 revealed individuals were older and were renting grazing land to a greater extent than in 2007. Second, when making land management decisions, producers in 2017 focused on economic concerns more than environmental concerns compared with more balanced views in 2007. For those who prioritized the environment over economics, this prioritization was related to both higher levels of education and a willingness to reduce stocking rate (livestock production) if there is a positive conservation outcome. In contrast, a lower willingness to reduce stocking was associated with increasing rental acreage and prevalence of an invasive cool-season grass that responds favorably to heavy grazing (tall fescue, Schedonorus arundinaceus Schreb.). Regardless, about 37% of cattle producers representing ∼ 40% of the land area surveyed were at least moderately willing to reduce stocking rates to achieve a conservation outcome. In conclusion, our findings suggest that producers’ need to gain income from livestock may limit the willingness to enact a conservation practice similar to reduced stocking rates. However, there is clearly conservation receptiveness from a segment of the producer community, which indicates potential for improved conservation.
KW - conservation practices
KW - decision making
KW - ecosystem services
KW - grazing lands
KW - livestock producer
KW - working landscapes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073820333
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073820333#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073820333
SN - 1550-7424
VL - 72
SP - 888
EP - 898
JO - Rangeland Ecology and Management
JF - Rangeland Ecology and Management
IS - 6
ER -