TY - JOUR
T1 - Shedding light on “Black Box” machine learning models for predicting the reactivity of HO[rad] radicals toward organic compounds
AU - Zhong, Shifa
AU - Zhang, Kai
AU - Wang, Dong
AU - Zhang, Huichun
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant CBET - 1804708 and the U. S. Department of Agriculture under Grant 1022123 .
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant CBET-1804708 and the U. S. Department of Agriculture under Grant 1022123.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) is an important approach to predicting the reactivity of HO radicals toward newly emerged organic compounds. As compared with molecular descriptors-based and the group contribution method-based QSARs, a combined molecular fingerprint-machine learning (ML) method can more quickly and accurately develop such models for a growing number of contaminants. However, it is yet unknown whether this method makes predictions by choosing meaningful structural features rather than spurious ones, which is vital for trusting the models. In this study, we developed QSAR models for the logkHO[rad] values of 1089 organic compounds in the aqueous phase by two ML algorithms—deep neural networks (DNN) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and interpreted the built models by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. The results showed that for the contribution of a given structural feature to logkHO[rad] for different compounds, DNN and XGBoost treated it as a fixed and variable value, respectively. We then developed an ensemble model combining the DNN with XGBoost, which achieved satisfactory predictive performance for all three datasets: Training dataset: R-square (R2) 0.89–0.91, root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) 0.21–0.23, and mean absolute error (MAE) 0.15–0.17; Validation dataset: R2 0.63–0.78, RMSE 0.29–0.32, and MAE 0.21–0.25; and Test dataset: R2 0.60–0.71, RMSE 0.30–0.35, and MAE 0.23–0.25. The SHAP method was further used to unveil that this ensemble model made predictions on logkHO[rad] based on a correct ‘understanding’ of the impact of electron-withdrawing and -donating groups and of the reactive sites in the compounds that can be attacked by HO[rad]. This study offered some much-needed mechanistic insights into a ML-assisted environmental task, which are important for evaluating the trustworthiness of the ML-based models, further improving the models for specific applications, and leveraging the implicit knowledge the models carry.
AB - Developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) is an important approach to predicting the reactivity of HO radicals toward newly emerged organic compounds. As compared with molecular descriptors-based and the group contribution method-based QSARs, a combined molecular fingerprint-machine learning (ML) method can more quickly and accurately develop such models for a growing number of contaminants. However, it is yet unknown whether this method makes predictions by choosing meaningful structural features rather than spurious ones, which is vital for trusting the models. In this study, we developed QSAR models for the logkHO[rad] values of 1089 organic compounds in the aqueous phase by two ML algorithms—deep neural networks (DNN) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and interpreted the built models by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. The results showed that for the contribution of a given structural feature to logkHO[rad] for different compounds, DNN and XGBoost treated it as a fixed and variable value, respectively. We then developed an ensemble model combining the DNN with XGBoost, which achieved satisfactory predictive performance for all three datasets: Training dataset: R-square (R2) 0.89–0.91, root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) 0.21–0.23, and mean absolute error (MAE) 0.15–0.17; Validation dataset: R2 0.63–0.78, RMSE 0.29–0.32, and MAE 0.21–0.25; and Test dataset: R2 0.60–0.71, RMSE 0.30–0.35, and MAE 0.23–0.25. The SHAP method was further used to unveil that this ensemble model made predictions on logkHO[rad] based on a correct ‘understanding’ of the impact of electron-withdrawing and -donating groups and of the reactive sites in the compounds that can be attacked by HO[rad]. This study offered some much-needed mechanistic insights into a ML-assisted environmental task, which are important for evaluating the trustworthiness of the ML-based models, further improving the models for specific applications, and leveraging the implicit knowledge the models carry.
KW - Deep neural network
KW - HO[rad] radical
KW - Machine learning
KW - Model interpretation
KW - QSARs
KW - XGBoost
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089414417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089414417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126627
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126627
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089414417
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 405
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 126627
ER -