TY - JOUR
T1 - Sharing the floodplain
T2 - Mediated modeling for environmental management
AU - Metcalf, Sara S.
AU - Wheeler, Emily
AU - BenDor, Todd K.
AU - Lubinski, Kenneth S.
AU - Hannon, Bruce M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The modeling workshop was supported by The Nature Conservancy and the National Mississippi River Museum and Aquarium. Brian Stenquist was the lead facilitator. Catherine McCalvin, Owen Dutt, and Tracy Boutelle served as observers. John Nestler, Nina Burkardt, and Mark Muller served as topical experts. Many thanks to the following reviewers for comments during the development of this paper: Mike Allen, Carol Augspurger, Jan BenDor, Nina Burkardt, Brian Ickes, Stacy Langsdale, Richard Lankau, Teri Metcalf, John Nestler, Sigrid Smith, Marjan van den Belt, and Wayne Wheeler. Sara Metcalf and Bruce Hannon also acknowledge support from NSF Award # HSD-0433165, “Ecological Boundary-Setting in Mental and Geophysical Models.”
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Complex ecosystems, such as the Upper Mississippi River (UMR), present major management challenges. Such systems often provide a range of ecosystem services that are differentially valued by stakeholders representing distinct interests (e.g., agriculture, conservation, navigation) or institutions (e.g., federal and state agencies). When no single entity has the knowledge or authority to resolve conflicts over shared resource use, stakeholders may struggle to jointly understand the scope of the problem and to reach reasonable compromises. This paper explores mediated modeling as a group consensus building process for understanding relationships between ecological, economic and cultural well-being in the UMR floodplain. We describe a workshop structure used to engage UMR stakeholders that may be extended to resource use conflicts in other complex ecosystems. We provide recommendations for improving on these participatory methods in structuring future efforts. In conclusion, we suggest that tools which facilitate collaborative learning, such as mediated modeling, need to be incorporated at an institutional level as a vital element of integrated ecosystem management.
AB - Complex ecosystems, such as the Upper Mississippi River (UMR), present major management challenges. Such systems often provide a range of ecosystem services that are differentially valued by stakeholders representing distinct interests (e.g., agriculture, conservation, navigation) or institutions (e.g., federal and state agencies). When no single entity has the knowledge or authority to resolve conflicts over shared resource use, stakeholders may struggle to jointly understand the scope of the problem and to reach reasonable compromises. This paper explores mediated modeling as a group consensus building process for understanding relationships between ecological, economic and cultural well-being in the UMR floodplain. We describe a workshop structure used to engage UMR stakeholders that may be extended to resource use conflicts in other complex ecosystems. We provide recommendations for improving on these participatory methods in structuring future efforts. In conclusion, we suggest that tools which facilitate collaborative learning, such as mediated modeling, need to be incorporated at an institutional level as a vital element of integrated ecosystem management.
KW - Collaborative learning
KW - Group modeling
KW - Land use change
KW - Participatory modeling
KW - Stakeholder participation
KW - Upper Mississippi River (UMR) floodplain
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957754824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957754824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77957754824
SN - 1364-8152
VL - 25
SP - 1282
EP - 1290
JO - Environmental Modelling and Software
JF - Environmental Modelling and Software
IS - 11
ER -