Shaping Rules and Practice for More Justice. Local Conventions and Local Resistance in Eastern Senegal

Papa Faye, Tobias Haller, Jesse Ribot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Participatory programs and the transfer of the means of regulation to local populations can move local people to adopt government or development project agendas. They do not always succeed. When externally driven agendas fail to match local norms and practices, they are resisted and re-worked to accommodate local views, needs, and aspirations. In this interaction both the external agenda and local norms are contested and reconstituted in ways that follow the contours of the power asymmetries among local actors and external resource users, government agents and project managers. In the Tambacounda Region of Senegal, forest-dwelling villagers constantly negotiate forest use with more powerful urban-based merchants and transhumant herders. Government and international development programs have introduced ‘local conventions,’ written agreements among resource users, to reduce conflict over resource-use decisions. However, despite elaboration through participatory processes these conventions impose rules of management and use that contradict local environmental subjectivities; consequently, local people resist and rework introduced rules, and thus reconstitute them as, at least partly, their own.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Ecology
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Keywords

  • Decentralization
  • Forestry
  • Local regulation
  • Local resistance
  • Senegal
  • Sustainable resource use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Anthropology
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shaping Rules and Practice for More Justice. Local Conventions and Local Resistance in Eastern Senegal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this