TY - JOUR
T1 - Shaping a Healthier LIHTC Housing Stock
T2 - Examining the Role of States’ Qualified Allocation Plans
AU - Ahrentzen, Sherry
AU - Dearborn, Lynne
AU - Momen-Heravi, Ali
AU - Sadoughi, Arezou
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The physical environment has a powerful impact on our physical and mental health, especially in our homes. One vehicle for advancing a healthier affordable housing stock is the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). The aim of this research was to examine the manner and extent to which various housing quality provisions pertaining to health are embedded in the Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) of the LIHTC program. From content analysis of the QAP of each of the 50 states and a survey of state housing finance agencies (HFAs), results revealed that: the most frequently required healthy housing provisions address housing quality, whereas the most incentivized ones address proximity to neighborhood services and amenities; few states bundle high-priority provisions relevant to asthma, respiratory health and toxic exposures, which are major health concerns for vulnerable children; the top two motivators for considering healthy housing provisions in the LIHTC process were “championship and initiation by agency staff” and “learning of similar practices in other states”; among other findings. Recommendations are made for HFA practices, and directions for future research are proposed.
AB - The physical environment has a powerful impact on our physical and mental health, especially in our homes. One vehicle for advancing a healthier affordable housing stock is the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). The aim of this research was to examine the manner and extent to which various housing quality provisions pertaining to health are embedded in the Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) of the LIHTC program. From content analysis of the QAP of each of the 50 states and a survey of state housing finance agencies (HFAs), results revealed that: the most frequently required healthy housing provisions address housing quality, whereas the most incentivized ones address proximity to neighborhood services and amenities; few states bundle high-priority provisions relevant to asthma, respiratory health and toxic exposures, which are major health concerns for vulnerable children; the top two motivators for considering healthy housing provisions in the LIHTC process were “championship and initiation by agency staff” and “learning of similar practices in other states”; among other findings. Recommendations are made for HFA practices, and directions for future research are proposed.
KW - Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
KW - healthy housing
KW - housing quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133594954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133594954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10511482.2022.2086896
DO - 10.1080/10511482.2022.2086896
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133594954
SN - 1051-1482
VL - 33
SP - 1206
EP - 1227
JO - Housing Policy Debate
JF - Housing Policy Debate
IS - 5
ER -