Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Beginning in the 1970s, women filed lawsuits in U.S. federal courts arguing that unwanted sexual attention at workplace constituted a form of sex discrimination. After decades of judicial policy-making, the legal definition of sexual harassment remains ambiguous, and the process for offering relief to targets of harassment reflects employers' interests in addition to employee rights. At the same time, sociologists and psychologists have explored the causes of employee's experiences with sexual conduct in the workplace and its impact on the targets. Social scientists have also analyzed organizational responses to sexual harassment, research that raises questions about how legal rights ought best be protected. This article examines sexual harassment law in the United States, and then turns to the social science literature that documents the frequency of harassment, employees' understanding of their rights and their willingness to file claims, and concludes by considering evidence of 'sexual harassment in the workplace' (rather than 'at workplace').

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages721-727
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780080970875
ISBN (Print)9780080970868
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 26 2015

Fingerprint

sexual harassment
workplace
employee
lawsuit
social scientist
psychologist
sociologist
employer
discrimination
social science
cause
Law
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • Employment discrimination
  • Gender and law
  • Grievance procedures
  • Hostile working environment
  • Organizations
  • Quid pro quo
  • Sex discrimination
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sexuality and gender
  • Stereotypes
  • Work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Marshall, A-M. (2015). Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 721-727). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7

Sexual Harassment : United States and Beyond. / Marshall, Anna-Maria.

International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2015. p. 721-727.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Marshall, A-M 2015, Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond. in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., pp. 721-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7
Marshall A-M. Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc. 2015. p. 721-727 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7
Marshall, Anna-Maria. / Sexual Harassment : United States and Beyond. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2015. pp. 721-727
@inbook{f03cbcd16cc84472a60866752836547a,
title = "Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond",
abstract = "Beginning in the 1970s, women filed lawsuits in U.S. federal courts arguing that unwanted sexual attention at workplace constituted a form of sex discrimination. After decades of judicial policy-making, the legal definition of sexual harassment remains ambiguous, and the process for offering relief to targets of harassment reflects employers' interests in addition to employee rights. At the same time, sociologists and psychologists have explored the causes of employee's experiences with sexual conduct in the workplace and its impact on the targets. Social scientists have also analyzed organizational responses to sexual harassment, research that raises questions about how legal rights ought best be protected. This article examines sexual harassment law in the United States, and then turns to the social science literature that documents the frequency of harassment, employees' understanding of their rights and their willingness to file claims, and concludes by considering evidence of 'sexual harassment in the workplace' (rather than 'at workplace').",
keywords = "Employment discrimination, Gender and law, Grievance procedures, Hostile working environment, Organizations, Quid pro quo, Sex discrimination, Sexual harassment, Sexuality and gender, Stereotypes, Work",
author = "Anna-Maria Marshall",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780080970868",
pages = "721--727",
booktitle = "International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sexual Harassment

T2 - United States and Beyond

AU - Marshall, Anna-Maria

PY - 2015/3/26

Y1 - 2015/3/26

N2 - Beginning in the 1970s, women filed lawsuits in U.S. federal courts arguing that unwanted sexual attention at workplace constituted a form of sex discrimination. After decades of judicial policy-making, the legal definition of sexual harassment remains ambiguous, and the process for offering relief to targets of harassment reflects employers' interests in addition to employee rights. At the same time, sociologists and psychologists have explored the causes of employee's experiences with sexual conduct in the workplace and its impact on the targets. Social scientists have also analyzed organizational responses to sexual harassment, research that raises questions about how legal rights ought best be protected. This article examines sexual harassment law in the United States, and then turns to the social science literature that documents the frequency of harassment, employees' understanding of their rights and their willingness to file claims, and concludes by considering evidence of 'sexual harassment in the workplace' (rather than 'at workplace').

AB - Beginning in the 1970s, women filed lawsuits in U.S. federal courts arguing that unwanted sexual attention at workplace constituted a form of sex discrimination. After decades of judicial policy-making, the legal definition of sexual harassment remains ambiguous, and the process for offering relief to targets of harassment reflects employers' interests in addition to employee rights. At the same time, sociologists and psychologists have explored the causes of employee's experiences with sexual conduct in the workplace and its impact on the targets. Social scientists have also analyzed organizational responses to sexual harassment, research that raises questions about how legal rights ought best be protected. This article examines sexual harassment law in the United States, and then turns to the social science literature that documents the frequency of harassment, employees' understanding of their rights and their willingness to file claims, and concludes by considering evidence of 'sexual harassment in the workplace' (rather than 'at workplace').

KW - Employment discrimination

KW - Gender and law

KW - Grievance procedures

KW - Hostile working environment

KW - Organizations

KW - Quid pro quo

KW - Sex discrimination

KW - Sexual harassment

KW - Sexuality and gender

KW - Stereotypes

KW - Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043429549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043429549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86109-7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85043429549

SN - 9780080970868

SP - 721

EP - 727

BT - International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -