Sex differences in the response to emotional distraction: An event-related fMRI investigation

Alexandru D. Iordan, Sanda Dolcos, Ekaterina Denkova, Florin Dolcos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evidence has suggested that women have greater emotional reactivity than men. However, it is unclear whether these differences in basic emotional responses are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and what the neural mechanisms that implement differences in emotional distractibility between women and men are. Functional MRI recording was used in conjunction with a working memory (WM) task, with emotional distraction (angry faces) presented during the interval between the memoranda and the probes. First, we found an increased impact of emotional distraction among women in trials associated with high-confidence responses, in the context of overall similar WM performance in women and men. Second, women showed increased sensitivity to emotional distraction in brain areas associated with "hot" emotional processing, whereas men showed increased sensitivity in areas associated with "cold" executive processing, in the context of overall similar patterns of response to emotional distraction in women and men. Third, a sex-related dorsal-ventral hemispheric dissociation emerged in the lateral PFC related to coping with emotional distraction, with women showing a positive correlation with WM performance in left ventral PFC, and men showing similar effects in the right dorsal PFC. In addition to extending to men results that have previously been reported in women, by showing that both sexes engage mechanisms that are similar overall in response to emotional distraction, the present study identifies sex differences in both the response to and coping with emotional distraction. These results have implications for understanding sex differences in the susceptibility to affective disorders, in which basic emotional responses, emotional distractibility, and coping abilities are altered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-134
Number of pages19
JournalCognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Short-Term Memory
Dissociative Disorders
Aptitude
Mood Disorders
Brain

Keywords

  • Amygdala
  • Dorsolateral/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC/vlPFC)
  • Emotional interference
  • Fusiform face area (FFA)
  • Social anxiety
  • Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Sex differences in the response to emotional distraction : An event-related fMRI investigation. / Iordan, Alexandru D.; Dolcos, Sanda; Denkova, Ekaterina; Dolcos, Florin.

In: Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.03.2013, p. 116-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{463365f66c4d40378bd5993de732258f,
title = "Sex differences in the response to emotional distraction: An event-related fMRI investigation",
abstract = "Evidence has suggested that women have greater emotional reactivity than men. However, it is unclear whether these differences in basic emotional responses are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and what the neural mechanisms that implement differences in emotional distractibility between women and men are. Functional MRI recording was used in conjunction with a working memory (WM) task, with emotional distraction (angry faces) presented during the interval between the memoranda and the probes. First, we found an increased impact of emotional distraction among women in trials associated with high-confidence responses, in the context of overall similar WM performance in women and men. Second, women showed increased sensitivity to emotional distraction in brain areas associated with {"}hot{"} emotional processing, whereas men showed increased sensitivity in areas associated with {"}cold{"} executive processing, in the context of overall similar patterns of response to emotional distraction in women and men. Third, a sex-related dorsal-ventral hemispheric dissociation emerged in the lateral PFC related to coping with emotional distraction, with women showing a positive correlation with WM performance in left ventral PFC, and men showing similar effects in the right dorsal PFC. In addition to extending to men results that have previously been reported in women, by showing that both sexes engage mechanisms that are similar overall in response to emotional distraction, the present study identifies sex differences in both the response to and coping with emotional distraction. These results have implications for understanding sex differences in the susceptibility to affective disorders, in which basic emotional responses, emotional distractibility, and coping abilities are altered.",
keywords = "Amygdala, Dorsolateral/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC/vlPFC), Emotional interference, Fusiform face area (FFA), Social anxiety, Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC)",
author = "Iordan, {Alexandru D.} and Sanda Dolcos and Ekaterina Denkova and Florin Dolcos",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13415-012-0134-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "116--134",
journal = "Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "1530-7026",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in the response to emotional distraction

T2 - An event-related fMRI investigation

AU - Iordan, Alexandru D.

AU - Dolcos, Sanda

AU - Denkova, Ekaterina

AU - Dolcos, Florin

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Evidence has suggested that women have greater emotional reactivity than men. However, it is unclear whether these differences in basic emotional responses are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and what the neural mechanisms that implement differences in emotional distractibility between women and men are. Functional MRI recording was used in conjunction with a working memory (WM) task, with emotional distraction (angry faces) presented during the interval between the memoranda and the probes. First, we found an increased impact of emotional distraction among women in trials associated with high-confidence responses, in the context of overall similar WM performance in women and men. Second, women showed increased sensitivity to emotional distraction in brain areas associated with "hot" emotional processing, whereas men showed increased sensitivity in areas associated with "cold" executive processing, in the context of overall similar patterns of response to emotional distraction in women and men. Third, a sex-related dorsal-ventral hemispheric dissociation emerged in the lateral PFC related to coping with emotional distraction, with women showing a positive correlation with WM performance in left ventral PFC, and men showing similar effects in the right dorsal PFC. In addition to extending to men results that have previously been reported in women, by showing that both sexes engage mechanisms that are similar overall in response to emotional distraction, the present study identifies sex differences in both the response to and coping with emotional distraction. These results have implications for understanding sex differences in the susceptibility to affective disorders, in which basic emotional responses, emotional distractibility, and coping abilities are altered.

AB - Evidence has suggested that women have greater emotional reactivity than men. However, it is unclear whether these differences in basic emotional responses are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and what the neural mechanisms that implement differences in emotional distractibility between women and men are. Functional MRI recording was used in conjunction with a working memory (WM) task, with emotional distraction (angry faces) presented during the interval between the memoranda and the probes. First, we found an increased impact of emotional distraction among women in trials associated with high-confidence responses, in the context of overall similar WM performance in women and men. Second, women showed increased sensitivity to emotional distraction in brain areas associated with "hot" emotional processing, whereas men showed increased sensitivity in areas associated with "cold" executive processing, in the context of overall similar patterns of response to emotional distraction in women and men. Third, a sex-related dorsal-ventral hemispheric dissociation emerged in the lateral PFC related to coping with emotional distraction, with women showing a positive correlation with WM performance in left ventral PFC, and men showing similar effects in the right dorsal PFC. In addition to extending to men results that have previously been reported in women, by showing that both sexes engage mechanisms that are similar overall in response to emotional distraction, the present study identifies sex differences in both the response to and coping with emotional distraction. These results have implications for understanding sex differences in the susceptibility to affective disorders, in which basic emotional responses, emotional distractibility, and coping abilities are altered.

KW - Amygdala

KW - Dorsolateral/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC/vlPFC)

KW - Emotional interference

KW - Fusiform face area (FFA)

KW - Social anxiety

KW - Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873845946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873845946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13415-012-0134-6

DO - 10.3758/s13415-012-0134-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 23293019

AN - SCOPUS:84873845946

VL - 13

SP - 116

EP - 134

JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 1530-7026

IS - 1

ER -