Sex differences in behavior and neural development and their role in adolescent vulnerability to substance use

Lindsey R. Hammerslag, Joshua M. Gulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adolescents are especially prone to risky behavior and to the emergence of psychological disorders like substance abuse, anxiety and depression. However, there is a sex (or gender) difference in this vulnerability, with females being more prone to developing internalizing disorders and males being more likely to engage in risky behavior and drug use. While several researchers have proposed that there is a relationship between corticolimbic circuit development and adolescent vulnerability, the current proposed models do not take sex differences into account. In this review, we explore recent findings from both human and rodent studies of sex differences during adolescence. In particular, we consider epidemiological studies on the factors that contribute to the development of substance abuse and internalizing disorders, laboratory studies on reward-related and decision-making behavior, and neuroanatomical studies on the development of several structures in the corticolimbic circuit (i.e., prefrontal cortex [PFC], amygdala and striatum). We then integrate these recent findings into models of adolescent vulnerability to substance use that have previously not addressed sex differences. Lastly, we discuss methodological considerations for the interpretation and design of studies on sex (or gender) differences during adolescence while highlighting some opportunities for future investigations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-26
Number of pages12
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume298
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Amygdala
  • PFC
  • Sex
  • Striatum
  • Substance use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in behavior and neural development and their role in adolescent vulnerability to substance use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this