TY - JOUR
T1 - Setting priorities for protected area planning in a conflict zone - Afghanistan's National Protected Area System Plan
AU - Johnson, McKenzie F.
AU - Kanderian, Nina
AU - Shank, Christopher C.
AU - Rahmani, Haqiq
AU - Lawson, David
AU - Smallwood, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was made possible by the generous support of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). We would like to thank our working group partners including the National Environmental Protection Agency of Afghanistan (especially His Excellency Mostapha Zaher, Mr. Sulaimanshah Sallari, and Mr. Najibullah Yamin), the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock (especially Mr. Moh. Hashim Barikzai and Mr. Abdul Samai Sakhi), the Biodiversity Support Program through ECODIT, the Program of Work on Protected Areas Support Consortium (especially Jamison Ervin) and the United Nations Environment Program in Afghanistan. We would also like to thank the numerous communities in northern and eastern Afghanistan who participated in consultations to improve the NPASP. Finally, we would like to thank the Wildlife Conservation Society Asia Program, especially Colin Poole and Peter Zahler, for their logistical and program support.
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - Planning for protected area networks is often done on an ad hoc basis, especially in data-poor countries. Afghanistan, a country mired in conflict for the past 30years, has little of the relevant data to plan a protected area network, and security concerns hinder collection of new data. However, conservation of Afghanistan's natural resources will be critical to recovery efforts. To assist Afghanistan in planning for its protected area network, we conducted an analysis to identify ecologically important areas for conservation. We overlaid data from ecoregion, floral, and faunal analyses on a grid map of Afghanistan (313 cells each 2500km 2), and used a ranking system to determine those cells containing diverse and/or threatened ecosystems. A color gradation was applied to each cell (white - least diverse to black - most diverse) to produce a map visually depicting ecological diversity across Afghanistan. Those cells with the highest scores were labeled as Priority Zones - defined as areas in which Afghanistan should prioritize conservation activities for protected area designation. Our results formed the basis of the National Protected Area System Plan of Afghanistan, a document setting quantitative protected area targets and outlining a concrete plan of action for the designation of a protected area network. We found the Priority Zone model to be useful in helping Government partners locate areas potentially important for conservation and prioritize activities for protected area designation. This process may be useful for other conflict or post-conflict countries working to establish protected area networks in a data deficient environment.
AB - Planning for protected area networks is often done on an ad hoc basis, especially in data-poor countries. Afghanistan, a country mired in conflict for the past 30years, has little of the relevant data to plan a protected area network, and security concerns hinder collection of new data. However, conservation of Afghanistan's natural resources will be critical to recovery efforts. To assist Afghanistan in planning for its protected area network, we conducted an analysis to identify ecologically important areas for conservation. We overlaid data from ecoregion, floral, and faunal analyses on a grid map of Afghanistan (313 cells each 2500km 2), and used a ranking system to determine those cells containing diverse and/or threatened ecosystems. A color gradation was applied to each cell (white - least diverse to black - most diverse) to produce a map visually depicting ecological diversity across Afghanistan. Those cells with the highest scores were labeled as Priority Zones - defined as areas in which Afghanistan should prioritize conservation activities for protected area designation. Our results formed the basis of the National Protected Area System Plan of Afghanistan, a document setting quantitative protected area targets and outlining a concrete plan of action for the designation of a protected area network. We found the Priority Zone model to be useful in helping Government partners locate areas potentially important for conservation and prioritize activities for protected area designation. This process may be useful for other conflict or post-conflict countries working to establish protected area networks in a data deficient environment.
KW - Afghanistan
KW - Conflict
KW - Conservation hotspots
KW - Conservation planning
KW - Protected area planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863413698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863413698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.021
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84863413698
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 148
SP - 146
EP - 155
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - 1
ER -