Setting material function design targets for linear viscoelastic materials and structures

R. E. Corman, Lakshmi Rao, N. Ashwin Bharadwaj, James Allison, Randy H Ewoldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rheologically complex materials are described by function-valued properties with dependence on a timescale (linear viscoelasticity), input amplitude (nonlinear material behavior), or more generally both (nonlinear viscoelasticity). This complexity presents a difficulty when trying to utilize these material systems in engineering designs. Here, we focus on linear viscoelasticity and a methodology to identify the desired viscoelastic behavior. This is an early-stage design step to optimize target (function-valued) properties before choosing or synthesizing a real material. In linear viscoelasticity, it is not obvious which properties can be treated as independent design variables. Thus, it is nontrivial to select the most design-appropriate constitutive model, to be as general as possible, but not violate fundamental restrictions. We use the Kramers-Kronig constraint to show that frequency-dependent moduli (e.g., shear moduli G and G00) cannot be treated as two independent design variables. Rather, a single function such as the relaxation modulus (e.g., K(t) for force-relaxation or G(t) for stress relaxation) is an appropriate function-valued design variable. A simple case study is used to demonstrate the framework in which we identify target properties for a vibration isolation system. Viscoelasticity improves performance. Different parameterizations of the kernel function are optimized and compared for performance. While parameterization may limit the generality of the kernel function, we do include a nonobvious representation (power law) that is found in real viscoelastic material systems and in the spring-dashpot paradigm would require an infinite number of components. Our methodology provides a means to answer the question, "What viscoelastic properties are desirable?" This ability to identify targeted behavior will be useful for subsequent stages of the design process including the selection or synthesis of real materials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4032698
JournalJournal of Mechanical Design, Transactions Of the ASME
Volume138
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Viscoelasticity
Parameterization
Stress relaxation
Constitutive models
Elastic moduli

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Setting material function design targets for linear viscoelastic materials and structures. / Corman, R. E.; Rao, Lakshmi; Ashwin Bharadwaj, N.; Allison, James; Ewoldt, Randy H.

In: Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions Of the ASME, Vol. 138, No. 5, 4032698, 01.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c522e0aa77a42bd8269bb1a3c23a696,
title = "Setting material function design targets for linear viscoelastic materials and structures",
abstract = "Rheologically complex materials are described by function-valued properties with dependence on a timescale (linear viscoelasticity), input amplitude (nonlinear material behavior), or more generally both (nonlinear viscoelasticity). This complexity presents a difficulty when trying to utilize these material systems in engineering designs. Here, we focus on linear viscoelasticity and a methodology to identify the desired viscoelastic behavior. This is an early-stage design step to optimize target (function-valued) properties before choosing or synthesizing a real material. In linear viscoelasticity, it is not obvious which properties can be treated as independent design variables. Thus, it is nontrivial to select the most design-appropriate constitutive model, to be as general as possible, but not violate fundamental restrictions. We use the Kramers-Kronig constraint to show that frequency-dependent moduli (e.g., shear moduli G and G00) cannot be treated as two independent design variables. Rather, a single function such as the relaxation modulus (e.g., K(t) for force-relaxation or G(t) for stress relaxation) is an appropriate function-valued design variable. A simple case study is used to demonstrate the framework in which we identify target properties for a vibration isolation system. Viscoelasticity improves performance. Different parameterizations of the kernel function are optimized and compared for performance. While parameterization may limit the generality of the kernel function, we do include a nonobvious representation (power law) that is found in real viscoelastic material systems and in the spring-dashpot paradigm would require an infinite number of components. Our methodology provides a means to answer the question, {"}What viscoelastic properties are desirable?{"} This ability to identify targeted behavior will be useful for subsequent stages of the design process including the selection or synthesis of real materials.",
author = "Corman, {R. E.} and Lakshmi Rao and {Ashwin Bharadwaj}, N. and James Allison and Ewoldt, {Randy H}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4032698",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
journal = "Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "1050-0472",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting material function design targets for linear viscoelastic materials and structures

AU - Corman, R. E.

AU - Rao, Lakshmi

AU - Ashwin Bharadwaj, N.

AU - Allison, James

AU - Ewoldt, Randy H

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Rheologically complex materials are described by function-valued properties with dependence on a timescale (linear viscoelasticity), input amplitude (nonlinear material behavior), or more generally both (nonlinear viscoelasticity). This complexity presents a difficulty when trying to utilize these material systems in engineering designs. Here, we focus on linear viscoelasticity and a methodology to identify the desired viscoelastic behavior. This is an early-stage design step to optimize target (function-valued) properties before choosing or synthesizing a real material. In linear viscoelasticity, it is not obvious which properties can be treated as independent design variables. Thus, it is nontrivial to select the most design-appropriate constitutive model, to be as general as possible, but not violate fundamental restrictions. We use the Kramers-Kronig constraint to show that frequency-dependent moduli (e.g., shear moduli G and G00) cannot be treated as two independent design variables. Rather, a single function such as the relaxation modulus (e.g., K(t) for force-relaxation or G(t) for stress relaxation) is an appropriate function-valued design variable. A simple case study is used to demonstrate the framework in which we identify target properties for a vibration isolation system. Viscoelasticity improves performance. Different parameterizations of the kernel function are optimized and compared for performance. While parameterization may limit the generality of the kernel function, we do include a nonobvious representation (power law) that is found in real viscoelastic material systems and in the spring-dashpot paradigm would require an infinite number of components. Our methodology provides a means to answer the question, "What viscoelastic properties are desirable?" This ability to identify targeted behavior will be useful for subsequent stages of the design process including the selection or synthesis of real materials.

AB - Rheologically complex materials are described by function-valued properties with dependence on a timescale (linear viscoelasticity), input amplitude (nonlinear material behavior), or more generally both (nonlinear viscoelasticity). This complexity presents a difficulty when trying to utilize these material systems in engineering designs. Here, we focus on linear viscoelasticity and a methodology to identify the desired viscoelastic behavior. This is an early-stage design step to optimize target (function-valued) properties before choosing or synthesizing a real material. In linear viscoelasticity, it is not obvious which properties can be treated as independent design variables. Thus, it is nontrivial to select the most design-appropriate constitutive model, to be as general as possible, but not violate fundamental restrictions. We use the Kramers-Kronig constraint to show that frequency-dependent moduli (e.g., shear moduli G and G00) cannot be treated as two independent design variables. Rather, a single function such as the relaxation modulus (e.g., K(t) for force-relaxation or G(t) for stress relaxation) is an appropriate function-valued design variable. A simple case study is used to demonstrate the framework in which we identify target properties for a vibration isolation system. Viscoelasticity improves performance. Different parameterizations of the kernel function are optimized and compared for performance. While parameterization may limit the generality of the kernel function, we do include a nonobvious representation (power law) that is found in real viscoelastic material systems and in the spring-dashpot paradigm would require an infinite number of components. Our methodology provides a means to answer the question, "What viscoelastic properties are desirable?" This ability to identify targeted behavior will be useful for subsequent stages of the design process including the selection or synthesis of real materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963778826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963778826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4032698

DO - 10.1115/1.4032698

M3 - Article

VL - 138

JO - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

SN - 1050-0472

IS - 5

M1 - 4032698

ER -