Sequential pyroxasulfone applications with fluxofenim reduce sorghum injury and increase weed control

Loren V. Goodrich, Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer, German A Bollero, Dean Edward Riechers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Controlling weeds selectively is a challenge when producing grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Pyroxasulfone, a preemergence (PRE) herbicide, has demonstrated excellent grass and broadleaf control in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. However, pyroxasulfone is not labeled for grain sorghum because crop injury is a major limitation. Our first objective was to evaluate five herbicide safeners in the greenhouse to determine their ability to protect sorghum from pyroxasulfone. Growth data indicated seed-applied fluxofenim provided the highest level of protection to emerging seedlings. A second objective was to evaluate fluxofenim for protecting sorghum from single and sequential pyroxasulfone applications in the field. A split-plot in a randomized complete block design evaluated six pyroxasulfone (whole plot) and two fluxofenim treatments (subplot) in 2015 and 2016. A single PRE treatment of S-metolachlor, an untreated-weedy control, and weed-free control were compared with pyroxasulfone to assess weed control, crop injury and stand count, and grain yield. Pyroxasulfone provided greater weed control than S-metolachlor. However, as pyroxasulfone rates increased both weed control and crop injury increased, regardless of safener. In contrast, sequential pyroxasulfone applications (90/120 or 120/90 g ai ha–1) did not elicit as much crop injury or stand reductions as a single PRE application at the same total rate (210 g ai ha–1) and maintained weed control, which resulted in higher yields. Despite increased crop tolerance and yield with sequential relative to single pyroxasulfone applications, these findings indicate a more effective herbicide safener for pyroxasulfone in grain sorghum is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1915-1924
Number of pages10
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume110
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

pyroxasulfone
Sorghum (Poaceae)
weed control
grain sorghum
crops
metolachlor
herbicide safeners
herbicides
weeds
Sorghum bicolor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Sequential pyroxasulfone applications with fluxofenim reduce sorghum injury and increase weed control. / Goodrich, Loren V.; Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Carrie J.; Bollero, German A; Riechers, Dean Edward.

In: Agronomy Journal, Vol. 110, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 1915-1924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1202006316b42b4bc87198cae066556,
title = "Sequential pyroxasulfone applications with fluxofenim reduce sorghum injury and increase weed control",
abstract = "Controlling weeds selectively is a challenge when producing grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Pyroxasulfone, a preemergence (PRE) herbicide, has demonstrated excellent grass and broadleaf control in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. However, pyroxasulfone is not labeled for grain sorghum because crop injury is a major limitation. Our first objective was to evaluate five herbicide safeners in the greenhouse to determine their ability to protect sorghum from pyroxasulfone. Growth data indicated seed-applied fluxofenim provided the highest level of protection to emerging seedlings. A second objective was to evaluate fluxofenim for protecting sorghum from single and sequential pyroxasulfone applications in the field. A split-plot in a randomized complete block design evaluated six pyroxasulfone (whole plot) and two fluxofenim treatments (subplot) in 2015 and 2016. A single PRE treatment of S-metolachlor, an untreated-weedy control, and weed-free control were compared with pyroxasulfone to assess weed control, crop injury and stand count, and grain yield. Pyroxasulfone provided greater weed control than S-metolachlor. However, as pyroxasulfone rates increased both weed control and crop injury increased, regardless of safener. In contrast, sequential pyroxasulfone applications (90/120 or 120/90 g ai ha–1) did not elicit as much crop injury or stand reductions as a single PRE application at the same total rate (210 g ai ha–1) and maintained weed control, which resulted in higher yields. Despite increased crop tolerance and yield with sequential relative to single pyroxasulfone applications, these findings indicate a more effective herbicide safener for pyroxasulfone in grain sorghum is required.",
author = "Goodrich, {Loren V.} and Butts-Wilmsmeyer, {Carrie J.} and Bollero, {German A} and Riechers, {Dean Edward}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2134/agronj2018.01.0014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "1915--1924",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
issn = "0002-1962",
publisher = "American Society of Agronomy",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential pyroxasulfone applications with fluxofenim reduce sorghum injury and increase weed control

AU - Goodrich, Loren V.

AU - Butts-Wilmsmeyer, Carrie J.

AU - Bollero, German A

AU - Riechers, Dean Edward

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Controlling weeds selectively is a challenge when producing grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Pyroxasulfone, a preemergence (PRE) herbicide, has demonstrated excellent grass and broadleaf control in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. However, pyroxasulfone is not labeled for grain sorghum because crop injury is a major limitation. Our first objective was to evaluate five herbicide safeners in the greenhouse to determine their ability to protect sorghum from pyroxasulfone. Growth data indicated seed-applied fluxofenim provided the highest level of protection to emerging seedlings. A second objective was to evaluate fluxofenim for protecting sorghum from single and sequential pyroxasulfone applications in the field. A split-plot in a randomized complete block design evaluated six pyroxasulfone (whole plot) and two fluxofenim treatments (subplot) in 2015 and 2016. A single PRE treatment of S-metolachlor, an untreated-weedy control, and weed-free control were compared with pyroxasulfone to assess weed control, crop injury and stand count, and grain yield. Pyroxasulfone provided greater weed control than S-metolachlor. However, as pyroxasulfone rates increased both weed control and crop injury increased, regardless of safener. In contrast, sequential pyroxasulfone applications (90/120 or 120/90 g ai ha–1) did not elicit as much crop injury or stand reductions as a single PRE application at the same total rate (210 g ai ha–1) and maintained weed control, which resulted in higher yields. Despite increased crop tolerance and yield with sequential relative to single pyroxasulfone applications, these findings indicate a more effective herbicide safener for pyroxasulfone in grain sorghum is required.

AB - Controlling weeds selectively is a challenge when producing grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Pyroxasulfone, a preemergence (PRE) herbicide, has demonstrated excellent grass and broadleaf control in maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. However, pyroxasulfone is not labeled for grain sorghum because crop injury is a major limitation. Our first objective was to evaluate five herbicide safeners in the greenhouse to determine their ability to protect sorghum from pyroxasulfone. Growth data indicated seed-applied fluxofenim provided the highest level of protection to emerging seedlings. A second objective was to evaluate fluxofenim for protecting sorghum from single and sequential pyroxasulfone applications in the field. A split-plot in a randomized complete block design evaluated six pyroxasulfone (whole plot) and two fluxofenim treatments (subplot) in 2015 and 2016. A single PRE treatment of S-metolachlor, an untreated-weedy control, and weed-free control were compared with pyroxasulfone to assess weed control, crop injury and stand count, and grain yield. Pyroxasulfone provided greater weed control than S-metolachlor. However, as pyroxasulfone rates increased both weed control and crop injury increased, regardless of safener. In contrast, sequential pyroxasulfone applications (90/120 or 120/90 g ai ha–1) did not elicit as much crop injury or stand reductions as a single PRE application at the same total rate (210 g ai ha–1) and maintained weed control, which resulted in higher yields. Despite increased crop tolerance and yield with sequential relative to single pyroxasulfone applications, these findings indicate a more effective herbicide safener for pyroxasulfone in grain sorghum is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052684273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052684273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2134/agronj2018.01.0014

DO - 10.2134/agronj2018.01.0014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052684273

VL - 110

SP - 1915

EP - 1924

JO - Agronomy Journal

JF - Agronomy Journal

SN - 0002-1962

IS - 5

ER -