Sequencing and timing of strategic responses after industry disruption: Evidence from post-deregulation competition in the US railroad industry

Michael L. Pettus, Yasemin Y. Kor, Joseph T Mahoney, Steven C Michael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the sequencing and timing of firms’ strategic responses after significant industry disruption. We show that it is not the single strategic choice or response per se, but the sequencing and patterns of consecutive strategic responses that drive a firm’s adaptation and survival in the aftermath of a shift in the industry. We find that firms’ renewal efforts involved differential adaptability in finding balance at the juxtaposition of responding to demand-side pressures and choosing a path of new capability acquisition efficiently. Our study underscores the importance of taking a sequencing approach to studying strategic responses to industry disruption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-400
Number of pages28
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

railroad
deregulation
firm
industry
evidence
demand
Strategic response
Disruption
Railroad
Deregulation
Industry
Sequencing

Keywords

  • capability acquisition
  • differential adaptability
  • industry disruption
  • regulatory shift (deregulation)
  • sequencing and timing of strategic responses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Sequencing and timing of strategic responses after industry disruption : Evidence from post-deregulation competition in the US railroad industry. / Pettus, Michael L.; Kor, Yasemin Y.; Mahoney, Joseph T; Michael, Steven C.

In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.11.2018, p. 373-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1426c8a4d374417f867ffaa2a419d3d6,
title = "Sequencing and timing of strategic responses after industry disruption: Evidence from post-deregulation competition in the US railroad industry",
abstract = "This article examines the sequencing and timing of firms’ strategic responses after significant industry disruption. We show that it is not the single strategic choice or response per se, but the sequencing and patterns of consecutive strategic responses that drive a firm’s adaptation and survival in the aftermath of a shift in the industry. We find that firms’ renewal efforts involved differential adaptability in finding balance at the juxtaposition of responding to demand-side pressures and choosing a path of new capability acquisition efficiently. Our study underscores the importance of taking a sequencing approach to studying strategic responses to industry disruption.",
keywords = "capability acquisition, differential adaptability, industry disruption, regulatory shift (deregulation), sequencing and timing of strategic responses",
author = "Pettus, {Michael L.} and Kor, {Yasemin Y.} and Mahoney, {Joseph T} and Michael, {Steven C}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476127017743502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "373--400",
journal = "Strategic Organization",
issn = "1476-1270",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequencing and timing of strategic responses after industry disruption

T2 - Evidence from post-deregulation competition in the US railroad industry

AU - Pettus, Michael L.

AU - Kor, Yasemin Y.

AU - Mahoney, Joseph T

AU - Michael, Steven C

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - This article examines the sequencing and timing of firms’ strategic responses after significant industry disruption. We show that it is not the single strategic choice or response per se, but the sequencing and patterns of consecutive strategic responses that drive a firm’s adaptation and survival in the aftermath of a shift in the industry. We find that firms’ renewal efforts involved differential adaptability in finding balance at the juxtaposition of responding to demand-side pressures and choosing a path of new capability acquisition efficiently. Our study underscores the importance of taking a sequencing approach to studying strategic responses to industry disruption.

AB - This article examines the sequencing and timing of firms’ strategic responses after significant industry disruption. We show that it is not the single strategic choice or response per se, but the sequencing and patterns of consecutive strategic responses that drive a firm’s adaptation and survival in the aftermath of a shift in the industry. We find that firms’ renewal efforts involved differential adaptability in finding balance at the juxtaposition of responding to demand-side pressures and choosing a path of new capability acquisition efficiently. Our study underscores the importance of taking a sequencing approach to studying strategic responses to industry disruption.

KW - capability acquisition

KW - differential adaptability

KW - industry disruption

KW - regulatory shift (deregulation)

KW - sequencing and timing of strategic responses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055496520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055496520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476127017743502

DO - 10.1177/1476127017743502

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 373

EP - 400

JO - Strategic Organization

JF - Strategic Organization

SN - 1476-1270

IS - 4

ER -