Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences

Rebecca C. Fuller, David Houle, Joseph Travis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The sensory bias model of sexual selection posits that female mating preferences are by-products of natural selection on sensory systems. Although sensory bias was proposed 20 years ago, its critical assumptions remain untested. This paradox arises because sensory bias has been used to explain two different phenomena. First, it has been used as a hypothesis about signal design, that is, that males evolve traits that stimulate female sensory systems. Second, sensory bias has been used as a hypothesis for the evolution of female preference itself, that is, to explain why females exhibit particular preferences. We focus on this second facet. First, we clarify the unique features of sensory bias relative to the alternative models by considering each in the same quantitative genetic framework. The key assumptions of sensory bias are that natural selection is the predominant evolutionary mechanism that affects preference and that sexual selection on preferences is quantitatively negligible. We describe four studies that would test these assumptions and review what we can and cannot infer about sensory bias from existing studies. We suggest that the importance of sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of female preferences remains to be determined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)437-446
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume166
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2005

Fingerprint

mating behavior
sensory system
sexual selection
natural selection
quantitative genetics
byproducts

Keywords

  • Direct benefits
  • Female choice
  • Fisherian runaway
  • Good-genes model
  • Sensory exploitation
  • Sexual conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. / Fuller, Rebecca C.; Houle, David; Travis, Joseph.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 166, No. 4, 01.10.2005, p. 437-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Fuller, Rebecca C. ; Houle, David ; Travis, Joseph. / Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. In: American Naturalist. 2005 ; Vol. 166, No. 4. pp. 437-446.
@article{3639e335159143e4b7ade40bc75cafe3,
title = "Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences",
abstract = "The sensory bias model of sexual selection posits that female mating preferences are by-products of natural selection on sensory systems. Although sensory bias was proposed 20 years ago, its critical assumptions remain untested. This paradox arises because sensory bias has been used to explain two different phenomena. First, it has been used as a hypothesis about signal design, that is, that males evolve traits that stimulate female sensory systems. Second, sensory bias has been used as a hypothesis for the evolution of female preference itself, that is, to explain why females exhibit particular preferences. We focus on this second facet. First, we clarify the unique features of sensory bias relative to the alternative models by considering each in the same quantitative genetic framework. The key assumptions of sensory bias are that natural selection is the predominant evolutionary mechanism that affects preference and that sexual selection on preferences is quantitatively negligible. We describe four studies that would test these assumptions and review what we can and cannot infer about sensory bias from existing studies. We suggest that the importance of sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of female preferences remains to be determined.",
keywords = "Direct benefits, Female choice, Fisherian runaway, Good-genes model, Sensory exploitation, Sexual conflict",
author = "Fuller, {Rebecca C.} and David Houle and Joseph Travis",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/444443",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "437--446",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences

AU - Fuller, Rebecca C.

AU - Houle, David

AU - Travis, Joseph

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - The sensory bias model of sexual selection posits that female mating preferences are by-products of natural selection on sensory systems. Although sensory bias was proposed 20 years ago, its critical assumptions remain untested. This paradox arises because sensory bias has been used to explain two different phenomena. First, it has been used as a hypothesis about signal design, that is, that males evolve traits that stimulate female sensory systems. Second, sensory bias has been used as a hypothesis for the evolution of female preference itself, that is, to explain why females exhibit particular preferences. We focus on this second facet. First, we clarify the unique features of sensory bias relative to the alternative models by considering each in the same quantitative genetic framework. The key assumptions of sensory bias are that natural selection is the predominant evolutionary mechanism that affects preference and that sexual selection on preferences is quantitatively negligible. We describe four studies that would test these assumptions and review what we can and cannot infer about sensory bias from existing studies. We suggest that the importance of sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of female preferences remains to be determined.

AB - The sensory bias model of sexual selection posits that female mating preferences are by-products of natural selection on sensory systems. Although sensory bias was proposed 20 years ago, its critical assumptions remain untested. This paradox arises because sensory bias has been used to explain two different phenomena. First, it has been used as a hypothesis about signal design, that is, that males evolve traits that stimulate female sensory systems. Second, sensory bias has been used as a hypothesis for the evolution of female preference itself, that is, to explain why females exhibit particular preferences. We focus on this second facet. First, we clarify the unique features of sensory bias relative to the alternative models by considering each in the same quantitative genetic framework. The key assumptions of sensory bias are that natural selection is the predominant evolutionary mechanism that affects preference and that sexual selection on preferences is quantitatively negligible. We describe four studies that would test these assumptions and review what we can and cannot infer about sensory bias from existing studies. We suggest that the importance of sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of female preferences remains to be determined.

KW - Direct benefits

KW - Female choice

KW - Fisherian runaway

KW - Good-genes model

KW - Sensory exploitation

KW - Sexual conflict

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26644432045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26644432045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/444443

DO - 10.1086/444443

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16224700

AN - SCOPUS:26644432045

VL - 166

SP - 437

EP - 446

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 4

ER -