TY - GEN
T1 - Sensor Locations for Occupant Thermal Comfort State Prediction
AU - Bucarelli, Nidia
AU - El-Gohary, Nora
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 ASCE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Indoor air temperature, which is one of the main factors affecting the thermal comfort of occupants, varies across locations/spaces. However, current occupant thermal comfort models rely on predefined formulas or data-driven approaches that often ignore the importance of the specific location in the room at which the sensor is placed. This research aims to study the impact of sensor location on occupant thermal comfort state prediction. A set of 90-min occupant experiments were conducted in a controlled environment. Multiple temperature and humidity sensors were placed at different locations in the room. During the experiments, the room temperature changed from 19°C to 29°C, and the humidity, mean radiant temperature, and wind speed were controlled. The subjects performed office duties and provided feedback about their thermal comfort periodically. Personal parameter data were also collected. For each sensor location, a thermal comfort state model was developed using the XGBoost algorithm. Each model was tested in predicting the occupant comfort state using temperature and humidity data from other room locations. The results showed that the location of indoor parameter data used for prediction could affect model performances by up to ±7.2% accuracy and ±8.0% F1-measure.
AB - Indoor air temperature, which is one of the main factors affecting the thermal comfort of occupants, varies across locations/spaces. However, current occupant thermal comfort models rely on predefined formulas or data-driven approaches that often ignore the importance of the specific location in the room at which the sensor is placed. This research aims to study the impact of sensor location on occupant thermal comfort state prediction. A set of 90-min occupant experiments were conducted in a controlled environment. Multiple temperature and humidity sensors were placed at different locations in the room. During the experiments, the room temperature changed from 19°C to 29°C, and the humidity, mean radiant temperature, and wind speed were controlled. The subjects performed office duties and provided feedback about their thermal comfort periodically. Personal parameter data were also collected. For each sensor location, a thermal comfort state model was developed using the XGBoost algorithm. Each model was tested in predicting the occupant comfort state using temperature and humidity data from other room locations. The results showed that the location of indoor parameter data used for prediction could affect model performances by up to ±7.2% accuracy and ±8.0% F1-measure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188748404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188748404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784485262.049
DO - 10.1061/9780784485262.049
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85188748404
T3 - Construction Research Congress 2024, CRC 2024
SP - 476
EP - 486
BT - Advanced Technologies, Automation, and Computer Applications in Construction
A2 - Shane, Jennifer S.
A2 - Madson, Katherine M.
A2 - Mo, Yunjeong
A2 - Poleacovschi, Cristina
A2 - Sturgill, Roy E.
PB - American Society of Civil Engineers
T2 - Construction Research Congress 2024, CRC 2024
Y2 - 20 March 2024 through 23 March 2024
ER -