TY - GEN
T1 - Sensitivity analysis for the steady-state response of damped linear elastodynamic systems subject to periodic loads
AU - Tortorelli, Daniel A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1990 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). All rights reserved.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Adjoint and direct differentiation methods are used to formulate design sensitivities for the steady-state response of damped linear elastodynamic systems that are subject to periodic loads. Variations of a general response functional are expressed in explicit form with respect to design field perturbations. Modal analysis techniques which uncouple the equations of motion are used to perform the analyses. In this way, it is possible to obtain closed form relations for the sensitivity expressions. This eliminates the need to evaluate the adjoint response and psuedo response (these responses are associated with the adjoint and direct differentiation sensitivity problems) over the time domain. The sensitivities need not be numerically integrated over time, thus they are quickly computed. The methodology is valid for problems with proportional as well as non-proportional damping. In an example problem, sensitivities of steady-state vibration amplitude of a crankshaft subject to engine firing loads are evaluated with respect to the stiffness, inertial, and damping parameters which define the shaft. Both the adjoint and direct differentiation methods are used to compute the sensitivities. Finite difference sensitivity approximations are also calculated to validate the explicit sensitivity results.
AB - Adjoint and direct differentiation methods are used to formulate design sensitivities for the steady-state response of damped linear elastodynamic systems that are subject to periodic loads. Variations of a general response functional are expressed in explicit form with respect to design field perturbations. Modal analysis techniques which uncouple the equations of motion are used to perform the analyses. In this way, it is possible to obtain closed form relations for the sensitivity expressions. This eliminates the need to evaluate the adjoint response and psuedo response (these responses are associated with the adjoint and direct differentiation sensitivity problems) over the time domain. The sensitivities need not be numerically integrated over time, thus they are quickly computed. The methodology is valid for problems with proportional as well as non-proportional damping. In an example problem, sensitivities of steady-state vibration amplitude of a crankshaft subject to engine firing loads are evaluated with respect to the stiffness, inertial, and damping parameters which define the shaft. Both the adjoint and direct differentiation methods are used to compute the sensitivities. Finite difference sensitivity approximations are also calculated to validate the explicit sensitivity results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948897148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948897148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DETC1990-0084
DO - 10.1115/DETC1990-0084
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84948897148
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference
SP - 315
EP - 323
BT - Optimal Design and Mechanical Systems Analysis
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 1990 Design Technical Conferences, DETC 1990
Y2 - 16 September 1990 through 19 September 1990
ER -