Self-consistent analysis of OH-Zeeman observations

Too much noise about noise

Telemachos Ch Mouschovias, Konstantinos Tassis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We have recently re-analysed in a self-consistent way OH-Zeeman observations in four molecular-cloud envelopes and we have shown that, contrary to claims by Crutcher et al., there is no evidence that the mass-to-flux ratio decreases from the envelopes to the cores of these clouds. The key difference between our data analysis and the earlier one by Crutcher et al. is the relaxation of the overly restrictive assumption made by Crutcher et al, that the magnetic field strength is independent of position in each of the four envelopes. In a more recent paper, Crutcher et al. (1) claim that our analysis is not self-consistent, in that it misses a cosine factor, and (2) present new arguments to support their contention that the magnetic field strength is indeed independent of position in each of the four envelopes. We show that the claim of the missing cosine factor is false; that the new arguments contain even more serious problems than the Crutcher et al. original data analysis; and we present new observational evidence, independent of the OH-Zeeman data, that suggests significant variations in the magnetic field strength in the four cloud envelopes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-807
Number of pages7
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume409
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

envelopes
magnetic field
field strength
magnetic fields
molecular clouds
analysis
data analysis

Keywords

  • Diffusion
  • ISM: clouds
  • ISM: magnetic fields
  • MHD
  • Stars: formation
  • Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Self-consistent analysis of OH-Zeeman observations : Too much noise about noise. / Mouschovias, Telemachos Ch; Tassis, Konstantinos.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 409, No. 2, 01.12.2010, p. 801-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{322077d9c9f246e2b07d66ebe175f9cb,
title = "Self-consistent analysis of OH-Zeeman observations: Too much noise about noise",
abstract = "We have recently re-analysed in a self-consistent way OH-Zeeman observations in four molecular-cloud envelopes and we have shown that, contrary to claims by Crutcher et al., there is no evidence that the mass-to-flux ratio decreases from the envelopes to the cores of these clouds. The key difference between our data analysis and the earlier one by Crutcher et al. is the relaxation of the overly restrictive assumption made by Crutcher et al, that the magnetic field strength is independent of position in each of the four envelopes. In a more recent paper, Crutcher et al. (1) claim that our analysis is not self-consistent, in that it misses a cosine factor, and (2) present new arguments to support their contention that the magnetic field strength is indeed independent of position in each of the four envelopes. We show that the claim of the missing cosine factor is false; that the new arguments contain even more serious problems than the Crutcher et al. original data analysis; and we present new observational evidence, independent of the OH-Zeeman data, that suggests significant variations in the magnetic field strength in the four cloud envelopes.",
keywords = "Diffusion, ISM: clouds, ISM: magnetic fields, MHD, Stars: formation, Turbulence",
author = "Mouschovias, {Telemachos Ch} and Konstantinos Tassis",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17345.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "409",
pages = "801--807",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-consistent analysis of OH-Zeeman observations

T2 - Too much noise about noise

AU - Mouschovias, Telemachos Ch

AU - Tassis, Konstantinos

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - We have recently re-analysed in a self-consistent way OH-Zeeman observations in four molecular-cloud envelopes and we have shown that, contrary to claims by Crutcher et al., there is no evidence that the mass-to-flux ratio decreases from the envelopes to the cores of these clouds. The key difference between our data analysis and the earlier one by Crutcher et al. is the relaxation of the overly restrictive assumption made by Crutcher et al, that the magnetic field strength is independent of position in each of the four envelopes. In a more recent paper, Crutcher et al. (1) claim that our analysis is not self-consistent, in that it misses a cosine factor, and (2) present new arguments to support their contention that the magnetic field strength is indeed independent of position in each of the four envelopes. We show that the claim of the missing cosine factor is false; that the new arguments contain even more serious problems than the Crutcher et al. original data analysis; and we present new observational evidence, independent of the OH-Zeeman data, that suggests significant variations in the magnetic field strength in the four cloud envelopes.

AB - We have recently re-analysed in a self-consistent way OH-Zeeman observations in four molecular-cloud envelopes and we have shown that, contrary to claims by Crutcher et al., there is no evidence that the mass-to-flux ratio decreases from the envelopes to the cores of these clouds. The key difference between our data analysis and the earlier one by Crutcher et al. is the relaxation of the overly restrictive assumption made by Crutcher et al, that the magnetic field strength is independent of position in each of the four envelopes. In a more recent paper, Crutcher et al. (1) claim that our analysis is not self-consistent, in that it misses a cosine factor, and (2) present new arguments to support their contention that the magnetic field strength is indeed independent of position in each of the four envelopes. We show that the claim of the missing cosine factor is false; that the new arguments contain even more serious problems than the Crutcher et al. original data analysis; and we present new observational evidence, independent of the OH-Zeeman data, that suggests significant variations in the magnetic field strength in the four cloud envelopes.

KW - Diffusion

KW - ISM: clouds

KW - ISM: magnetic fields

KW - MHD

KW - Stars: formation

KW - Turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449250094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449250094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17345.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17345.x

M3 - Article

VL - 409

SP - 801

EP - 807

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 2

ER -