Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender

Shubhanshu Mishra, Brent D. Fegley, Jana Diesner, Vetle Ingvald Torvik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It was recently reported that men self-cite >50% more often than women across a wide variety of disciplines in the bibliographic database JSTOR. Here, we replicate this finding in a sample of 1.6 million papers from Author-ity, a version of PubMed with computationally disambiguated author names. More importantly, we show that the gender effect largely disappears when accounting for prior publication count in a multidimensional statistical model. Gender has the weakest effect on the probability of self-citation among an extensive set of features tested, including byline position, affiliation, ethnicity, collaboration size, time lag, subject-matter novelty, reference/citation counts, publication type, language, and venue. We find that self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender, who cite their novel journal publications early and in similar venues, and more often cross citation-barriers such as language and indexing. As a result, papers by authors with short, disrupted, or diverse careers miss out on the initial boost in visibility gained from self-citations. Our data further suggest that this disproportionately affects women because of attrition and not because of disciplinary under-specialization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0195773
JournalPloS one
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Visibility
Publications
gender
Language
Bibliographic Databases
Statistical Models
nationalities and ethnic groups
statistical models
PubMed
Names
sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender. / Mishra, Shubhanshu; Fegley, Brent D.; Diesner, Jana; Torvik, Vetle Ingvald.

In: PloS one, Vol. 13, No. 9, e0195773, 01.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a770b5280f974e9c8c7a1105862cd809,
title = "Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender",
abstract = "It was recently reported that men self-cite >50{\%} more often than women across a wide variety of disciplines in the bibliographic database JSTOR. Here, we replicate this finding in a sample of 1.6 million papers from Author-ity, a version of PubMed with computationally disambiguated author names. More importantly, we show that the gender effect largely disappears when accounting for prior publication count in a multidimensional statistical model. Gender has the weakest effect on the probability of self-citation among an extensive set of features tested, including byline position, affiliation, ethnicity, collaboration size, time lag, subject-matter novelty, reference/citation counts, publication type, language, and venue. We find that self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender, who cite their novel journal publications early and in similar venues, and more often cross citation-barriers such as language and indexing. As a result, papers by authors with short, disrupted, or diverse careers miss out on the initial boost in visibility gained from self-citations. Our data further suggest that this disproportionately affects women because of attrition and not because of disciplinary under-specialization.",
author = "Shubhanshu Mishra and Fegley, {Brent D.} and Jana Diesner and Torvik, {Vetle Ingvald}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0195773",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender

AU - Mishra, Shubhanshu

AU - Fegley, Brent D.

AU - Diesner, Jana

AU - Torvik, Vetle Ingvald

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - It was recently reported that men self-cite >50% more often than women across a wide variety of disciplines in the bibliographic database JSTOR. Here, we replicate this finding in a sample of 1.6 million papers from Author-ity, a version of PubMed with computationally disambiguated author names. More importantly, we show that the gender effect largely disappears when accounting for prior publication count in a multidimensional statistical model. Gender has the weakest effect on the probability of self-citation among an extensive set of features tested, including byline position, affiliation, ethnicity, collaboration size, time lag, subject-matter novelty, reference/citation counts, publication type, language, and venue. We find that self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender, who cite their novel journal publications early and in similar venues, and more often cross citation-barriers such as language and indexing. As a result, papers by authors with short, disrupted, or diverse careers miss out on the initial boost in visibility gained from self-citations. Our data further suggest that this disproportionately affects women because of attrition and not because of disciplinary under-specialization.

AB - It was recently reported that men self-cite >50% more often than women across a wide variety of disciplines in the bibliographic database JSTOR. Here, we replicate this finding in a sample of 1.6 million papers from Author-ity, a version of PubMed with computationally disambiguated author names. More importantly, we show that the gender effect largely disappears when accounting for prior publication count in a multidimensional statistical model. Gender has the weakest effect on the probability of self-citation among an extensive set of features tested, including byline position, affiliation, ethnicity, collaboration size, time lag, subject-matter novelty, reference/citation counts, publication type, language, and venue. We find that self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender, who cite their novel journal publications early and in similar venues, and more often cross citation-barriers such as language and indexing. As a result, papers by authors with short, disrupted, or diverse careers miss out on the initial boost in visibility gained from self-citations. Our data further suggest that this disproportionately affects women because of attrition and not because of disciplinary under-specialization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054104432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054104432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0195773

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0195773

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 9

M1 - e0195773

ER -