Abstract
Many organizations whose core purpose is to advance a social mission pay employees below-market wages. We investigate two under-appreciated benefits of below-market pay in these social-mission organizations. In a series of experiments, we predict and find that, holding employees' outside opportunities constant, those attracted to social-mission organizations that pay below-market wages perform better individually and cooperate more effectively in teams than those attracted to social-mission organizations that pay higher wages. The individual performance effect arises because below-market pay facilitates the selection of value-congruent employees who are naturally inclined to work hard for the organizational mission. The team cooperation effect arises because employees expect team members who have selected a social-mission job that pays below market to be more value-congruent and, therefore, more cooperative than those who have selected a social-mission job that pays higher wages. Collectively, we demonstrate that in social-mission organizations, offering below-market pay can yield selection benefits.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 57-77 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Accounting Review |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2020 |
Keywords
- Below-market pay
- Cooperation
- Employee selection
- Pay level
- Social mission
- Value congruence
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics