TY - JOUR
T1 - Seismic modeling of integral abutment bridges in Illinois
AU - Kozak, D. L.
AU - LaFave, J. M.
AU - Fahnestock, L. A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/6/15
Y1 - 2018/6/15
N2 - Integral abutment bridges (IABs) are a common bridge type used in modern design and construction to prevent damage at the abutment seat from water, dirt, or deicing chemicals penetrating through a compromised expansion joint. Elimination of expansion joints in IABs leads to complex soil-structure-interaction limit states involving the IAB abutment and surrounding soil, as well as unique overall bridge behavior in comparison to non-IABs. Despite this different behavior, there is a lack of studies investigating overall bridge performance of IABs when subjected to seismic loads. Existing seismic IAB studies have typically investigated individual components, such as the interaction between abutment piles and soil or the behavior of superstructure-abutment connections, but the comprehensive behavior of all IAB components when subjected to an earthquake has not been evaluated in an integrated fashion. This study details an IAB model developed for dynamic analysis that simultaneously considers contributions from all critical IAB components. The seismic response of two IABs, one with steel plate girders and another with precast prestressed concrete girders, is evaluated at the design-level shaking using the developed model. The design-level shaking is provided by 20 ground motions, for a 1000-year return period hazard-level, developed for the southern Illinois city of Cairo. Results demonstrate the ability of the IAB model to capture key features of bridge seismic behavior, and they provide a framework for bridge engineers to understand IAB earthquake response and limit states, as well as support recommendations for IAB seismic design in Illinois concerning side retainer anchor bolt size and pier column size.
AB - Integral abutment bridges (IABs) are a common bridge type used in modern design and construction to prevent damage at the abutment seat from water, dirt, or deicing chemicals penetrating through a compromised expansion joint. Elimination of expansion joints in IABs leads to complex soil-structure-interaction limit states involving the IAB abutment and surrounding soil, as well as unique overall bridge behavior in comparison to non-IABs. Despite this different behavior, there is a lack of studies investigating overall bridge performance of IABs when subjected to seismic loads. Existing seismic IAB studies have typically investigated individual components, such as the interaction between abutment piles and soil or the behavior of superstructure-abutment connections, but the comprehensive behavior of all IAB components when subjected to an earthquake has not been evaluated in an integrated fashion. This study details an IAB model developed for dynamic analysis that simultaneously considers contributions from all critical IAB components. The seismic response of two IABs, one with steel plate girders and another with precast prestressed concrete girders, is evaluated at the design-level shaking using the developed model. The design-level shaking is provided by 20 ground motions, for a 1000-year return period hazard-level, developed for the southern Illinois city of Cairo. Results demonstrate the ability of the IAB model to capture key features of bridge seismic behavior, and they provide a framework for bridge engineers to understand IAB earthquake response and limit states, as well as support recommendations for IAB seismic design in Illinois concerning side retainer anchor bolt size and pier column size.
KW - Integral abutment bridge
KW - Nonlinear modeling
KW - Seismic response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044161287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044161287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.088
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.088
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044161287
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 165
SP - 170
EP - 183
JO - Engineering Structures
JF - Engineering Structures
ER -